Archives

  • Calorie info is often missing from food delivery app menus
  • Play Video

    Battery-free robot microfliers use origami folds to descend

    Researchers developed small robotic devices that can change how they move through the air by "snapping" into a folded position during their descent. Each device has an onboard battery-free actuator, a solar power-harvesting circuit and controller to trigger these shape changes in mid-air. Shown here is a "microflier" in the unfolded state. (Credit: Mark Stone/U. Washington)

    Researchers have developed small robotic devices that can change how they move through the air by “snapping” into a folded position during their descent.

    When these microfliers are dropped from a drone, they use a Miura-ori origami fold to switch from tumbling and dispersing outward through the air to dropping straight to the ground. To spread out the fliers, the researchers control the timing of each device’s transition using a few methods: an onboard pressure sensor (estimating altitude), an onboard timer, or a Bluetooth signal.

    Robot microfliers weigh about 400 milligrams—about half as heavy as a nail—and can travel the distance of a football field when dropped from 40 meters (about 131 feet) in a light breeze. Each device has an onboard battery-free actuator, a solar power-harvesting circuit, and controller to trigger these shape changes in mid-air.

    A close-up of the folded microflier and its electronics.
    The circuits are assembled and patterned directly onto the flexible material that makes up the microfliers, as shown here. (Credit: Mark Stone/U. Washington)

    Microfliers also have the capacity to carry onboard sensors to survey temperature, humidity, and other conditions while soaring.

    “Using origami opens up a new design space for microfliers,” says co-senior author Vikram Iyer, assistant professor in the Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering at the University of Washington.

    “We combine the Miura-ori fold, which is inspired by geometric patterns found in leaves, with power harvesting and tiny actuators to allow our fliers to mimic the flight of different leaf types in mid-air.

    “In its unfolded flat state, our origami structure tumbles chaotically in the wind, similar to an elm leaf. But switching to the folded state changes the airflow around it and enables a stable descent, similarly to how a maple leaf falls. This highly energy efficient method allows us to have battery-free control over microflier descent, which was not possible before.”

    These robotic systems overcome several design challenges. The devices:

    • Are stiff enough to avoid accidentally transitioning to the folded state before the signal.
    • Transition between states rapidly. The devices’ onboard actuators need only about 25 milliseconds to initiate the folding.
    • Change shape while untethered from a power source. The microfliers’ power-harvesting circuit uses sunlight to provide energy to the actuator.

    The current robot microfliers can only transition in one direction—from the tumbling state to the falling state. This switch allows researchers to control the descent of multiple microfliers at the same time, so they disperse in different directions on their way down.

    Future devices will be able to transition in both directions, the researchers say. This added functionality will allow for more precise landings in turbulent wind conditions.

    The study appears in Science Robotics.

    The National Science Foundation, the National GEM Consortium, the Google fellowship program, the Cadence fellowship program, the Washington NASA Space Grant fellowship Program, the SPEEA ACE fellowship program, and a Moore Foundation fellowship funded the work.

    Source: University of Washington

    Play Video

    How birds perch could lead to nimbler flying robots

    (Credit: Getty Images)

    The way birds can successfully perch on the Teflon and other materials is teaching researchers how they might create flying robots that land like a bird.

    Under the watchful eyes of five high-speed cameras, a small, pale-blue bird named Gary waits for the signal to fly. Diana Chin, a graduate student at Stanford University and Gary’s trainer, points her finger to a perch about 20 inches away. The catch here is that the perch is covered in Teflon, making it seemingly impossible to stably grasp.

    Gary’s successful touchdown could help researcher build better flying robots.

    “Modern aerial robots usually need either a runway or a flat surface for easy takeoff and landing. For a bird, almost everywhere is a potential landing spot, even in cities,” says Chin, part of the lab of David Lentink, assistant professor of mechanical engineering. “We really wanted to understand how they accomplish that and the dynamics and forces that are involved.”

    Stick the landing

    Even the most advanced robots come nowhere near the grasping ability of animals when dealing with objects of varying shapes, sizes, and textures. So, the researchers gathered data about how Gary and two other birds land on different kinds of surfaces, including a variety of natural perches and artificial perches covered in foam, sandpaper, and Teflon.

    “This is not unlike asking an Olympic gymnast to land on Teflon-covered high bars without chalking their hands,” says Lentink, senior author of the paper in eLife. Yet, the parrotlets made what seems almost impossible for a human look effortless.

    The findings also include detailed studies of how the birds’ claws and feet produce friction. From this work, the researchers found that the secret to the parrotlet’s perching versatility is in the grip.

    “When we look at a person running, a squirrel jumping, or a bird flying, it is clear that we have a long way to go before our technology can reach the complex potential of these animals, both in terms of efficiency and controlled athleticism,” says William Roderick, a graduate student in mechanical engineering in the Lentink lab and in the lab of Mark Cutkosky, chair in the School of Engineering.

    “Through studying natural systems that have evolved over millions of years, we can make tremendous strides toward constructing systems with unprecedented capabilities.”

    It’s all in the grip

    The perches researchers used in the study aren’t your average pet store stock. The researchers split them in two, lengthwise, at the point that approximately aligned with the center of a parrotlet’s foot. As far as the bird was concerned, the perches felt like a single branch but each half sat atop its own 6-axis force/torque sensor.

    This meant the researchers could capture the total forces the bird put on the perch in many directions and how those forces differed between the halves—which indicated how hard the birds were squeezing.

    After the birds flapped to all nine force-sensing perches of assorted size, softness, and slipperiness, the group began analyzing the first stages of landing. Comparing different perch surfaces, they expected to see differences in how the birds approached the perch and the force with which they landed, but that’s not what they found.

    “When we first processed all of our data on approach speed and the forces when the bird was landing, we didn’t see any obvious differences,” Chin says. “But then we started to look into kinematics of the feet and claws—the details of how they moved those—and discovered they adapt them to stick the landing.”

    The extent to which the birds wrapped their toes and curled their claws varied depending on what they encountered upon landing. On rough or squishy surfaces—such as the medium-size foam, sandpaper, and rough wood perches—their feet could generate high squeeze forces with little help from their claws.

    On perches that were hardest to grasp—the floss-silk wood, Teflon, and large birch—the birds curled their claws more, dragging them along the perch surface until they had secure footing.

    This variable grip suggests that, when building robots to land on a variety of surfaces, researchers could separate the control of approaching landing from the actions required for a successful touchdown.

    Their measurements also showed that the birds can reposition their claws from one graspable bump or pit to another in a mere 1 to 2 milliseconds. (For comparison, it takes a human about 100 to 400 milliseconds to blink.)

    Flying robots taking off

    The researchers have already begun characterizing how parrotlets take off from the different surfaces. Combined with their previous work exploring how parrotlets navigate their environment, the group hopes the findings can lead to more nimble flying robots.

    “If we can apply all that we learn, we can develop bimodal robots that can transition to and from the air in a wide range of different environments and increase the versatility of aerial robots that we have today,” Chin says.

    Toward that end, Roderick is working on designing the mechanisms that would mimic the birds’ gripping form and physics.

    “One application of this work that I’m interested in is having perching robots that can act as a team of tiny little scientists that make recordings, autonomously, for field research in forests or jungles,” he says.

    “I really enjoy drawing from the fundamentals of engineering and applying them to new fields to push the limits of what has been previously achieved and what is known.”

    The National Science Foundation, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford, and the Department of Defense funded the work.

    Source: Stanford University