Archives

  • Kids’ gun injuries come with massive costs
  • Play Video

    Writing letters by hand is the best way to learn to read

    "The real question is: Are there other benefits to handwriting that have to do with reading and spelling and understanding? We find there most definitely are," says Brenda Rapp. (Credit: Getty Images)

    Handwriting helps people learn reading skills surprisingly faster and significantly better than learning the same material through typing or watching videos, a new study shows.

    Though writing by hand is increasingly being eclipsed by the ease of using computers, the new study suggests we shouldn’t be so quick to throw away the pencils and paper.

    “…even though they were all good at recognizing letters, the writing training was the best at every other measure. And they required less time to get there.”

    “The question out there for parents and educators is why should our kids spend any time doing handwriting,” says Brenda Rapp, a professor of cognitive science at Johns Hopkins University and senior author of the paper in the journal Psychological Science. “Obviously, you’re going to be a better hand-writer if you practice it. But since people are handwriting less then maybe who cares?

    “The real question is: Are there other benefits to handwriting that have to do with reading and spelling and understanding? We find there most definitely are.”

    Write it down

    Rapp and lead author Robert Wiley, a former Johns Hopkins University PhD student who is now a professor at the University of North Carolina, Greensboro, conducted an experiment in which 42 people were taught the Arabic alphabet, split into three groups of learners: writers, typers, and video watchers.

    Everyone learned the letters one at a time by watching videos of them being written along with hearing names and sounds. After being introduced to each letter, the three groups attempted to learn what they just saw and heard in different ways.

    The video group got an on-screen flash of a letter and had to say if it was the same letter they’d just seen. The typers would have to find the letter on the keyboard. The writers had to copy the letter with pen and paper.

    At the end, after as many as six sessions, everyone could recognize the letters and made few mistakes when tested. But the writing group reached this level of proficiency faster than the other groups—a few of them in just two sessions.

    Next the researchers wanted to determine to what extent, if at all, the groups could generalize this new knowledge. In other words, they could all recognize the letters, but could anyone really use them like a pro, by writing with them, using them to spell new words, and using them to read unfamiliar words?

    The writing group was better—decisively—in all of those things.

    “The main lesson is that even though they were all good at recognizing letters, the writing training was the best at every other measure. And they required less time to get there,” Wiley says.

    Handwriting goes beyond penmanship

    The writing group ended up with more of the skills needed for expert adult-level reading and spelling. Wiley and Rapp say it’s because handwriting reinforces the visual and aural lessons. The advantage has nothing to do with penmanship—it’s that the simple act of writing by hand provides a perceptual-motor experience that unifies what is being learned about the letters (their shapes, their sounds, and their motor plans), which in turn creates richer knowledge and fuller, true learning, the team says.

    “With writing, you’re getting a stronger representation in your mind that lets you scaffold toward these other types of tasks that don’t in any way involve handwriting,” Wiley says.

    Although the participants in the study were adults, Wiley and Rapp expect they’d see the same results in children. The findings have implications for classrooms, where pencils and notebooks have taken a backseat in recent years to tablets and laptops, and teaching cursive handwriting is all but extinct.

    The findings also suggest that adults trying to learn a language with a different alphabet should supplement what they’re learning through apps or tapes with good old-fashioned paperwork.

    Wiley, for one, is making sure the kids in his life are stocked up on writing supplies.

    “I have three nieces and a nephew right now and my siblings ask me should we get them crayons and pens? I say yes, let them just play with the letters and start writing them and write them all the time. I bought them all finger paint for Christmas and told them let’s do letters.”

    Source: Johns Hopkins University

    Play Video

    Interface turns handwriting brain signals into text

    Brain-computer interfaces use tiny electrodes to record signals in the brain. (Credit: BrainGate.org)

    For the first time scientists have used an implanted sensor to record brain signals associated with handwriting and used those signals to create text on a computer in real time.

    As reported in the journal Nature, a clinical trial participant with cervical spinal cord injury used the system to “type” words on a computer at a rate of 90 characters per minute, more than double the previous record for typing with a brain-computer interface. The participant had to merely think about the hand motions involved in creating written letters to complete the task.

    The research team is hopeful that such a system could one day help to restore people’s ability to communicate following paralysis caused by injury or illness.

    The letters of the alphabet and then a "handwritten" version created using the brain-computer interface
    A clinical trial participant created these letters on a computer screen just by thinking about the act of moving his arm and hand to write. (Credit: BrainGate.org)

    The new study is part of the BrainGate clinical trial, directed by Leigh Hochberg, a critical care neurologist and a professor at Brown University’s School of Engineering affiliated with the Carney Institute for Brain Science.

    Frank Willett, a research scientist at Stanford University and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), led the study, which was supervised by Krishna Shenoy, a Stanford professor and HHMI investigator, and Jaimie Henderson, a professor of neurosurgery at Stanford.

    “An important mission of our BrainGate consortium research is to restore rapid, intuitive communication for people with severe speech or motor impairments,” says Hochberg, who also directs the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery at Massachusetts General Hospital and the VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology at the Veterans Affairs Providence Healthcare System.

    “Frank’s demonstration of fast, accurate neural decoding of handwriting marks an exciting new chapter in the development of clinically useful neurotechnologies.”

    Faster communication

    The BrainGate collaboration has worked for several years on systems that enable people to generate text through direct brain control. Previous incarnations have involved trial participants thinking about the motions involved in pointing to and clicking letters on a virtual keyboard. That system enabled one participant to type 40 characters per minute, which was the previous record speed.

    For the new study, the team wanted to find out if asking a participant to think about motions involved in writing letters and words by hand would be faster.

    “We want to find new ways of letting people communicate faster,” Willett says. “This new system uses both the rich neural activity recorded by intracortical electrodes and the power of language models that, when applied to the neurally decoded letters, can create rapid and accurate text.”

    The trial participant, a 65-year-old (at the time of the study) man, was paralyzed from the neck down by a spinal cord injury. As part of the clinical trial, Henderson placed two tiny electrodes about the size of a baby aspirin in a part of his brain associated with the movement of his right arm and hand.

    Using signals the sensors picked up from individual neurons when the man imagined writing, a machine learning algorithm recognized the patterns his brain produced with each letter. With this system, the man could copy sentences and answer questions at a rate similar to that of someone the same age typing on a smartphone.

    The system is so fast because each letter elicits a highly distinctive activity pattern, making it relatively easy for the algorithm to distinguish one from another, Willett says.

    Steady stream of BCI refinements

    The new research is the latest in a series of advances in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) made by the BrainGate collaboration, which includes researchers from Brown University, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, the Providence VA Medical Center, Stanford University, and Case Western Reserve University.

    In 2012, the team published landmark research in which clinical trial participants were able, for the first time, to operate multidimensional robotic prosthetics using a BCI.

    A steady stream of refinements to the system, as well as new clinical breakthroughs that have enabled people to directly control tablet apps and even move their own paralyzed limbs, have followed that work. Most recently, the team demonstrated the first human use of a wireless intracortical BCI that can transmit neural data at full bandwidth.

    Hochberg says he’s grateful to clinical trial participants for making these breakthroughs and future ones possible.

    “The people who enroll in the BrainGate trial are amazing,” Hochberg says. “It’s their pioneering spirit that not only allows us to gain new insights into human brain function, but that leads to the creation of systems that will help other people with paralysis.”

    The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the NIH BRAIN Initiative, the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, L. and P. Garlick, S. and B. Reeves, the Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute at Stanford, and the Simons Foundation Collaboration on the Global Brain funded the work.

    Source: Brown University