Archives

  • Chip splits cancer cells from blood for better analysis
  • Play Video

    Ear infection app finds fluid behind eardrum

    Randall Bly, assistant professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at the UW School of Medicine who practices at Seattle Children’s Hospital, uses the app to check his daughter's ear. (Credit: Dennis Wise/U. Washington)

    A new app uses a paper funnel and your phone’s microphone and speaker to detect fluid behind the eardrum, a sign of ear infections in children.

    Ear infections are the most common reason that parents bring their children to a pediatrician, according to the National Institutes of Health. The condition occurs when fluid builds up in the middle ear behind the eardrum and becomes infected.

    The fluid buildup, also common in another condition called otitis media with effusion, can cause pain and make it hard for children to hear, especially detrimental when they are learning to talk.

    Both conditions are hard to diagnose because they have vague symptoms: Sometimes children tug on their ears or have fevers, and sometimes there are no symptoms. In addition, young children may not be able to describe where they hurt.

    See the doctor?

    With the new app, the smartphone makes a series of soft audible chirps into the ear through a small paper funnel. Depending on the way the chirps reflect back to the phone, the app determines the likelihood of fluid present with a probability of detection of 85 percent. That’s on par with current methods that specialists use to detect fluid in the middle ear, which involve specialized tools using acoustics or a puff of air.

    “Designing an accurate screening tool on something as ubiquitous as a smartphone can be game changing for parents as well as health care providers in resource limited regions,” says coauthor Shyam Gollakota, an associate professor in the University of Washington’s Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering.

    “A key advantage of our technology is that it does not require any additional hardware other than a piece of paper and a software app running on the smartphone.”

    Once diagnosed, ear infections are easy to treat with observation or antibiotics. Doctors can monitor or drain persistent fluid to relieve symptoms of pain or hearing loss. A quick screening at home could help parents decide whether or not they need to take their child to the doctor.

    Sound waves and chirps

    The app sends sounds into the ear and measures how those sound waves change as they bounce off the eardrum. The new method involves a smartphone and a regular piece of paper that a doctor or parent can cut and fold into a funnel.

    The funnel rests on the outer ear and guides sound waves in and out of the ear canal. When the phone plays a continuous 150 millisecond sound—which sounds like a bird chirping—through the funnel, the sound waves bounce off the eardrum, travel back through the funnel. The phone’s microphone then picks up the sound waves along with the original chirps. Depending on whether there’s fluid inside, the reflected sound waves interfere with the original chirp sound waves differently.

    “It’s like tapping a wine glass,” says co-first author Justin Chan, a doctoral student in the Allen School. “Depending on how much liquid is in it, you get different sounds. Using machine learning on these sounds, we can detect the presence of liquid.”

    When there is no fluid behind the eardrum, the eardrum vibrates and sends a variety of sound waves back. These sound waves mildly interfere with the original chirp, creating a broad, shallow dip in the overall signal. But when the eardrum has fluid behind it, it doesn’t vibrate as well and reflects the original sound waves back. They interfere more strongly with the original chirp and create a narrow, deep dip in the signal.

    Ear tube surgery

    To train an algorithm that detects changes in the signal and classifies ears as having fluid or not, researchers tested 53 children between the ages of 18 months and 17 years at Seattle Children’s Hospital. About half of the children were scheduled to undergo surgery for ear tube placement, a common surgery for patients with chronic or recurrent incidents of ear fluid. The other half were scheduled to undergo a different surgery unrelated to ears, such as a tonsillectomy.

    “What is really unique about this study is that we used the gold standard for diagnosing ear infections,” says co-first author Sharat Raju, a surgical resident in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. “When we put in ear tubes, we make an incision into the eardrum and drain any fluid present. That’s the best way to tell if there is fluid behind the eardrum. So these surgeries created the ideal setting for this study.”

    After parents provided informed consent, the team recorded the chirps and their resulting sound waves from the patients’ ears immediately before surgery. Many of the children responded to the chirps by smiling or laughing.

    Among the children getting ear tubes, surgery revealed that 24 ears had fluid behind the eardrum, while 24 ears did not. For children scheduled for other surgeries, two ears had bulging eardrums characteristic of an ear infection, while the other 48 ears were fine. The algorithm correctly identified the likelihood of fluid 85 percent of the time, comparable to current methods that specialized doctors use to diagnose fluid in the middle ear.

    Then the team tested the algorithm on 15 ears belonging to younger children between 9 and 18 months of age. It correctly classified all five ears that were positive for fluid and nine out of the 10 ears, or 90 percent, that did not have fluid.

    “Even though our algorithm was trained on older kids, it still works well for this age group,” says coauthor Randall Bly, an assistant professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery who practices at Seattle Children’s Hospital. “This is critical because this group has a high incidence of ear infections.”

    Use it at home

    Because researchers want parents to use the technology at home, they trained parents how to use the system on their own children. Parents and doctors folded paper funnels, tested 25 ears, and compared the results. Both parents and doctors successfully detected the six fluid-filled ears. Parents and doctors also agreed on 18 out of the 19 ears with no fluid. In addition, parent and doctor tests generated similar-looking sound wave curves.

    “The ability to know how often and for how long fluid has been present could help us make the best management decisions with patients and parents,” Bly says. “It also could help primary care providers know when to refer to a specialist.”

    The team also tested the algorithm on a variety of smartphones and used different types of paper to make the funnel, with consistent results. The researchers plan on commercializing the technology through a spinout company, Edus Health, and then making the app available to the public.

    “Fluid behind the eardrum is so common in children that there’s a direct need for an accessible and accurate screening tool that can be used at home or in clinical settings,” Raju says. “If parents could use a piece of hardware they already have to do a quick physical exam that can say ‘Your child most likely doesn’t have ear fluid’ or ‘Your child likely has ear fluid, you should make an appointment with your pediatrician,’ that would be huge.”

    The National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Seattle Children’s Sie-Hatsukami Research Endowment funded the work., which appears in Science Translational Medicine.

    Source: University of Washington

    Play Video

    Barfing kid? Don’t waste your money on probiotics

    (Credit: Getty Images)

    It’s increasingly common to give children with stomach viruses some probiotics to ease their symptoms of vomiting and diarrhea. But research now shows that a common probiotic doesn’t make them feel better any faster.

    While rarely fatal in the United States, gastroenteritis—frequently yet inaccurately called “stomach flu”—accounts for 1.7 million pediatric emergency room visits and more than 70,000 hospitalizations each year.

    The study, involving nearly 1,000 children ages 3 months to 4 years, provides evidence against the popular and costly use of probiotics—live microorganisms believed to restore the balance of intestinal bacteria and boost the immune system. The findings appear in The New England Journal of Medicine.

    Probiotics for stomach viruses

    “Probiotics have become an increasingly popular way to treat children experiencing acute gastroenteritis,” says lead author David Schnadower, who conducted the research as a professor of pediatrics at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis and a physician at St. Louis Children’s Hospital.

    “Some smaller studies have indicated that probiotics may help, however, such studies had a number of limitations. We sought to provide independent and conclusive evidence for or against probiotic use in infants and toddlers with acute gastroenteritis.”

    The researchers evaluated a common probiotic known as Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, or LGG, which is for sale over the counter as Culturelle. Certain versions of the probiotic are intended for babies and children.

    A similar study in Canada, also published in the same issue of The New England Journal of Medicine and coauthored by Schnadower, evaluated effectiveness of a different probiotic—Lacidofil—in children with gastroenteritis. The findings of that study, led by the University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine in Alberta, mirror those of the US study.

    ‘No effect’

    “The results of the US and Canadian studies were not ambiguous,” adds the US study’s coauthor, Phillip I. Tarr, professor of pediatrics and director of the Pediatric Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition at Washington University. “Probiotics had no effect on the children,” Tarr says. “Parents are better off saving their money and using it to buy more fresh fruits and vegetables for their children.”

    “Because of the popularity of probiotics, it was important to make sure their use is worth the cost.”

    There are no treatments for pediatric acute gastroenteritis other than giving children fluids to prevent dehydration and, sometimes, medication to relieve nausea. The lack of options has prompted some physicians and parents to give ill children probiotics.

    Probiotics generally are considered safe. However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not regulate dietary supplements such as probiotics as stringently as it does prescription and over-the-counter drugs. “Also, manufacturers of probiotics generally can claim that these microorganisms have positive health benefits without rigorous evidence to support their use,” Schnadower says.

    Big business

    Consumers worldwide spend billions of dollars each year on probiotic-enriched foods, as well as over-the-counter supplements in pill and powder form. The researchers cited statistics showing that the global market for probiotics is predicted to expand in the United States from $37 billion in 2015 to $64 billion in 2023.

    “Because of the popularity of probiotics, it was important to make sure their use is worth the cost,” says Schnadower, who is now the senior academic director of the Division of Emergency Medicine at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. “In this instance, probiotics added no measurable benefit, and, therefore, they are not worth the added cost.”

    Kids in the ER

    The US study involved 971 children treated between July 2014 and June 2017 in the emergency departments at St. Louis Children’s and nine other geographically diverse US academic medical centers. Participants were eligible if they had come to the emergency room with symptoms of gastroenteritis: watery stools, vomiting, diarrhea, or other signs of acute intestinal infection. They also had to have not have taken probiotics in the preceding two weeks.

    Half of the children in the study were randomly assigned to receive the probiotic LGG twice daily for five days, while the others took a similarly looking and tasting placebo. Otherwise, the children received standard clinical care. Neither the researchers nor the parents knew which children had received the probiotics.

    Regardless of whether the children took a placebo or probiotic, their symptoms and recovery were nearly identical. The data showed that diarrhea in both groups of kids lasted about two days and the kids missed an average of two days of day care.

    “We tested many different scenarios—infants compared with toddlers, whether the patient had taken antibiotics, whether the gastroenteritis was caused by virus or bacteria, and how long the diarrhea had been going on before the treatment was given. We also had the probiotic independently tested for purity and strength. Every time, we reached the same conclusion,” Schnadower says. “LGG did not help.”

    Funding for the study came from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health. The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) receives support from the Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal, and Child Health Bureau, Emergency Medical Services for Children.

    Freedman receives support from the Alberta Children’s Hospital Foundation Professorship in Child Health and Wellness. Tarr receives support from the Washington University Digestive Diseases Research Core Center.

    The Food and Drug Administration granted an Investigational New Drug approval. iHealth Inc. provided L. rhamnosus GG and placebo capsules at no cost but had no involvement in the conduct or reporting of the trial.

    Source: Washington University in St. Louis