Archives

Play Video

How birds perch could lead to nimbler flying robots

(Credit: Getty Images)

The way birds can successfully perch on the Teflon and other materials is teaching researchers how they might create flying robots that land like a bird.

Under the watchful eyes of five high-speed cameras, a small, pale-blue bird named Gary waits for the signal to fly. Diana Chin, a graduate student at Stanford University and Gary’s trainer, points her finger to a perch about 20 inches away. The catch here is that the perch is covered in Teflon, making it seemingly impossible to stably grasp.

Gary’s successful touchdown could help researcher build better flying robots.

“Modern aerial robots usually need either a runway or a flat surface for easy takeoff and landing. For a bird, almost everywhere is a potential landing spot, even in cities,” says Chin, part of the lab of David Lentink, assistant professor of mechanical engineering. “We really wanted to understand how they accomplish that and the dynamics and forces that are involved.”

Stick the landing

Even the most advanced robots come nowhere near the grasping ability of animals when dealing with objects of varying shapes, sizes, and textures. So, the researchers gathered data about how Gary and two other birds land on different kinds of surfaces, including a variety of natural perches and artificial perches covered in foam, sandpaper, and Teflon.

“This is not unlike asking an Olympic gymnast to land on Teflon-covered high bars without chalking their hands,” says Lentink, senior author of the paper in eLife. Yet, the parrotlets made what seems almost impossible for a human look effortless.

The findings also include detailed studies of how the birds’ claws and feet produce friction. From this work, the researchers found that the secret to the parrotlet’s perching versatility is in the grip.

“When we look at a person running, a squirrel jumping, or a bird flying, it is clear that we have a long way to go before our technology can reach the complex potential of these animals, both in terms of efficiency and controlled athleticism,” says William Roderick, a graduate student in mechanical engineering in the Lentink lab and in the lab of Mark Cutkosky, chair in the School of Engineering.

“Through studying natural systems that have evolved over millions of years, we can make tremendous strides toward constructing systems with unprecedented capabilities.”

It’s all in the grip

The perches researchers used in the study aren’t your average pet store stock. The researchers split them in two, lengthwise, at the point that approximately aligned with the center of a parrotlet’s foot. As far as the bird was concerned, the perches felt like a single branch but each half sat atop its own 6-axis force/torque sensor.

This meant the researchers could capture the total forces the bird put on the perch in many directions and how those forces differed between the halves—which indicated how hard the birds were squeezing.

After the birds flapped to all nine force-sensing perches of assorted size, softness, and slipperiness, the group began analyzing the first stages of landing. Comparing different perch surfaces, they expected to see differences in how the birds approached the perch and the force with which they landed, but that’s not what they found.

“When we first processed all of our data on approach speed and the forces when the bird was landing, we didn’t see any obvious differences,” Chin says. “But then we started to look into kinematics of the feet and claws—the details of how they moved those—and discovered they adapt them to stick the landing.”

The extent to which the birds wrapped their toes and curled their claws varied depending on what they encountered upon landing. On rough or squishy surfaces—such as the medium-size foam, sandpaper, and rough wood perches—their feet could generate high squeeze forces with little help from their claws.

On perches that were hardest to grasp—the floss-silk wood, Teflon, and large birch—the birds curled their claws more, dragging them along the perch surface until they had secure footing.

This variable grip suggests that, when building robots to land on a variety of surfaces, researchers could separate the control of approaching landing from the actions required for a successful touchdown.

Their measurements also showed that the birds can reposition their claws from one graspable bump or pit to another in a mere 1 to 2 milliseconds. (For comparison, it takes a human about 100 to 400 milliseconds to blink.)

Flying robots taking off

The researchers have already begun characterizing how parrotlets take off from the different surfaces. Combined with their previous work exploring how parrotlets navigate their environment, the group hopes the findings can lead to more nimble flying robots.

“If we can apply all that we learn, we can develop bimodal robots that can transition to and from the air in a wide range of different environments and increase the versatility of aerial robots that we have today,” Chin says.

Toward that end, Roderick is working on designing the mechanisms that would mimic the birds’ gripping form and physics.

“One application of this work that I’m interested in is having perching robots that can act as a team of tiny little scientists that make recordings, autonomously, for field research in forests or jungles,” he says.

“I really enjoy drawing from the fundamentals of engineering and applying them to new fields to push the limits of what has been previously achieved and what is known.”

The National Science Foundation, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford, and the Department of Defense funded the work.

Source: Stanford University

Play Video

Wasp-inspired robots open doors by themselves

(Credit: Getty Images)

Researchers have modified small flying robots to grab and haul heavy loads with the help of powerful winches and two previous inventions: gecko adhesives and microspines.

A closed door is just one of many obstacles that poses no barrier to a new type of flying, micro, tugging robot called a FlyCroTug. Outfitted with advanced gripping technologies and the ability to move and pull on objects around it, two FlyCroTugs can jointly lasso the door handle and heave the door open.

FlyCroTugs are micro air vehicles that the researchers have modified so the vehicles can anchor themselves to various surfaces using adhesives inspired by the feet of geckos and insects, previously developed in Cutkosky’s lab.

FlyCroTugs can pull objects up to 40 times their weight. Similar vehicles can only lift objects about twice their own weight.

With these attachment mechanisms, FlyCroTugs can pull objects up to 40 times their weight, like door handles in one scenario, or cameras and water bottles in a rescue situation. Similar vehicles can only lift objects about twice their own weight using aerodynamic forces.

“When you’re a small robot, the world is full of large obstacles,” says Matthew Estrada, a Stanford graduate student and lead author of the paper, which appears in the journal Science Robotics. “Combining the aerodynamic forces of our aerial vehicle along with interaction forces that we generate with the attachment mechanisms resulted in something that was very mobile, very forceful, and micro as well.”

The researchers say the FlyCroTugs’ small size means they can navigate through snug spaces and fairly close to people, making them useful for search and rescue. Holding tightly to surfaces as they tug, the tiny robots could potentially move pieces of debris or position a camera to evaluate a treacherous area.

Nature-inspired gecko grippers and microspines

The natural world inspired FlyCroTugs. Hoping to have an air vehicle that was fast, small, and highly maneuverable but also able to move large loads, the researchers looked to wasps.

“Wasps can fly rapidly to a piece of food, and then if the thing’s too heavy to take off with, they drag it along the ground. So this was sort of the beginning inspiration for the approach we took,” says coauthor Mark Cutkosky, a professor of mechanical engineering.

The researchers read studies on wasp prey capture and transport, which identify the ratio of flight-related muscle to total mass that determines whether a wasp flies with its prey or drags it. They also followed the lead of the wasp in having different attachment options depending on where the FlyCroTugs land.

For smooth surfaces, the robots have gecko grippers, non-sticky adhesives that mimic a gecko’s intricate toe structures and hold on by creating intermolecular forces between the adhesive and the surface. For rough surfaces, researchers equipped these robots with 32 microspines, a series of fishhook-like metal spines that can individually latch onto small pits in a surface.

Each FlyCroTug has a winch with a cable and either microspines or gecko adhesive in order to tug. Beyond those fixed features they are otherwise highly modifiable. The location of the grippers can vary depending on the surface where they will be landing, and the researchers can also add parts for ground-based movement, such as wheels. Getting all of these features onto a small air vehicle with twice the weight of a golf ball was no small feat, according to the researchers.

“People tend to think of drones as machines that fly and observe the world, but flying insects do many other things—such as walking, climbing, grasping, building—and social insects can even cooperate to multiply forces,” says Dario Floreano, the senior author on the paper. “With this work, we show that small drones capable of anchoring to the environment and collaborating with fellow drones can perform tasks typically assigned to humanoid robots or much larger machines.”

Literally opening new doors

Drones and other small flying robots may seem like all the rage these days but the FlyCroTugs—with their ability to navigate to remote locations, anchor, and pull—fall into a more specific niche, according to Cutkosky.

“There are many laboratories around the world that are starting to work with small drones or air vehicles, but if you look at the ones that are also thinking about how these little vehicles can interact physically with the world, it’s a much smaller set,” he says.

The researchers can successfully open a door with two FlyCroTugs. They also had one fly atop a crumbling structure and haul up a camera to see inside. Next, they hope to work on autonomous control and the logistics of flying several vehicles at once.

“The tools to create vehicles like this are becoming more accessible,” says Estrada. “I’m excited at the prospect of increasingly incorporating these attachment mechanisms into the designer’s tool belt, enabling robots to take advantage of interaction forces with their environment and put these to useful ends.”

Additional researchers at École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland helped develop the FlyCroTugs.

The Swiss National Science Foundation, the National Science Foundation, a Swiss Government Excellence Scholarship, and the United States Army Research Laboratory MAST program funded this work.

Source: Stanford University

  • Robots still can’t outdo nature’s tiny speedsters