Progress towards gender equality has slowed or stalled entirely since the latter half of the 20th century, when, for many measures of gender inequality, women rapidly made up ground, according to a report.
“We’re in a new world of snail’s pace change…”
The State of the Union report, published by the Stanford University Center on Poverty and Inequality, addresses key questions about gender inequality in the United States, such as whether occupational segregation is declining, why there is still so much sexual harassment and discrimination, and when gender gaps in earnings, employment, and related labor market outcomes might finally close.
By examining different types of gender inequality at once, it becomes possible to fashion a systematic and coordinated policy response, says David Grusky, director of the Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality. “Otherwise, it’s all too easy to default to piecemeal policies, each oriented to a single narrow-gauge problem.”
This comprehensive approach reveals that for many outcomes women are not making up ground nearly as rapidly as they did in the 1970s and 1980s. Following World War II, women entered the workforce in record numbers, but the increase in labor force participation for women has stagnated, and women remain less likely than men to participate in the formal labor force. Similarly, the wage gap declined rapidly in the 1970s and 1980s, but the rate of decline has since slowed.
The report also identifies some disparities that favor women rather than men. For example, on average women live five years longer than men, though life expectancy rates have converged in recent years.
“Gender inequality is not a unidimensional problem in which all gaps favor men or all gaps are changing in the same way,” says Marybeth Mattingly, a research consultant at the Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality and an author of two of the chapters in the report.
Although the pattern of trends is complicated, the stalling-out of previously strong trends shows up repeatedly in the report. This stalling-out is especially prominent when measuring whether women and men are segregated into different types of roles in the family, workplace, and community.
For example, women streamed into formerly male-dominated occupations in the 1970s and 1980s, but the rate of occupational integration slowed after 1990. Even today, relatively few women are a bus driver, carpenter, or computer scientist. If rates of integration since 2000 are extrapolated, it would take a full 330 years before the workplace becomes completely integrated.
“We’re in a new world of snail’s pace change,” says Kim Weeden, one of the authors of the chapter on occupational segregation.
Why has it been so difficult for women to enter into historically male-dominated professions?
“Stereotypes and unconscious biases are getting in the way of faster social change,” says Shelley Correll, head of the Clayman Institute for Gender Research and an author of one of the chapters in the report.
“We still cling to the view that men and women are fundamentally different in interests and skills,” Correll says. This contributes to segregation both because “employers discriminate on the basis of these beliefs and workers sort themselves into gender-conforming roles.,
In the report’s concluding chapter, Correll and sociologist Marianne Cooper examine the most promising science-based policies for reducing gender inequality. Although “Congress remains gridlocked on gender and family issues,” they note that there have been “many promising developments at the state and local levels and in private industry, including the passage of paid leave policies and interventions within organizations to block unconscious biases from undervaluing women’s accomplishments.”
It’s also important to bear in mind, Grusky points out, that policy is not the only road to change. Even in a world in which standard gender policy has been sidelined, there’s still an important role for “bottom-up change” led by parents, millennials, and others.
“It’s becoming more common to encourage girls to take math classes or attend coding camps, to call out gender discrimination when it happens, to divide domestic chores somewhat more evenly, and to otherwise challenge conventional gender roles,” Grusky says.
These bottom-up efforts by early adopters may ultimately trigger a quick cascade of change, Grusky says.
“A bottom-up revolution—a #MeToo movement writ large—has the potential to bring about a dramatic reduction in gender inequality.”
Source: Stephanie Garlow for Stanford University