Land-use ‘mosaic’ is best for productivity and stability

"We found that landscapes consisting of a mosaic of different land uses were more productive than the average landscape with uniform use." (Credit: Getty Images)

A mix of different land-covers including grassland, forest, urban areas, and water bodies improves the function and stability of a landscape, irrespective of the plant species diversity, region, and climate, researchers report.

It is well-established that biodiverse ecosystems generally function better than monocultures, but, to date, biodiversity research has primarily focused on the number of plant species present in ecosystems.

“Most studies so far have used small, artificially established study plots. However, real-world landscapes are much more complex, and, in addition to natural areas, also contain human-dominated elements such as arable land and urban areas,” says Pascal Niklaus, professor at the evolutionary biology and environmental studies department at the University of Zurich.

Researchers investigated how different land-cover areas affect vegetation growth in large landscapes. Using aerial imagery, they assessed land-cover in 4,974 landscape plots from all regions in Switzerland. In addition to green areas such as grassland and forest they also considered human-dominated areas including arable fields and settlements. In parallel, they used satellite data to determine plant productivity in these landscapes over a period of 17 years.

“We found that landscapes consisting of a mosaic of different land uses were more productive than the average landscape with uniform use,” Niklaus says. This positive effect of land-use diversity and productivity held over many regions, climatic conditions, and altitude ranges. Landscape mosaics also showed a temporally more stable productivity. In other words, more diverse landscapes are able to mitigate effects of interannual climate variation.

The positive effects of land-use diversity were unrelated to the number of plant species present in these landscapes. This indicates that areas with different land uses interact and improve the functioning of the entire landscape, similar to the way in which plant species interact in a small patch of vegetation and thereby improve the functioning of the plant community.

“In such large landscapes, novel mechanisms must be at play that do not operate in the small study plots traditionally examined in biodiversity experiments,” says first author Jacqueline Oehri, a postdoc in the evolutionary biology and environmental studies department.

The specific nature of these mechanisms is the subject of further investigations. The authors speculate that, for example, urban areas and bodies of water affect climatic conditions in their surroundings, and that this might improve the productivity of vegetation in these areas.

The way in which different land uses are spatially interwoven thus promotes the functioning of landscapes, in addition to the established beneficial effects of high species diversity. The study’s new approach enables researchers to analyze landscapes on a scale that is relevant for regional planning and conservation policies. However, Niklaus emphasizes that “the fact that mixed landscapes function better should not be understood to mean that natural areas should be fragmented by expanding urban settlements”.

The research appears in Nature Communications.

Source: University of Zurich