For as long as people have been shopping for Christmas, there’s been concern about turning a religious celebration into a commercial bonanza.
This sentiment reaches back to when America was a backwater and the celebration of Christmas went from drinking and carousing to shopping and gift-giving.
“People have complained about the excessive commercialization of Christmas ever since its incarnation in the mid-19th century,” says Lisa Jacobson, history professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara. “There’s still ambivalence about the commercialization of Christmas. I don’t think that ambivalence has ever entirely disappeared, but it was probably more pronounced in the 19th century than it is now.”
Carousing and drinking
So what happened to Christmas in America? Jacobson, a cultural historian, notes that it was a confluence of influences, a kind of changing of the Yule season. Before the 19th century, Christmas was spread over several days.
“There was a lot of carousing, a lot of drinking, especially in the mid-Atlantic states and the South,” she says. The highlight—when gifts were exchanged—came on New Year’s Day.
“Until the mid-19th century merchants are actually pretty suspicious of holidays,” Jacobson explains. “Here is where the kind of Scrooge character actually had some real historical precedent. Holidays were seen as a hindrance to business. If you were drinking and carousing and having fun, it meant that work wasn’t going to get done.”
But, as President Calvin Coolidge would say nearly a century later, “The business of America is business,” and the country’s retailers would come to see the holidays’ potential for profit. They recognized, Jacobson says, that they had a genuine merchandizing opportunity, and that the holidays would create their own spending season.
“Santa Claus is one way Americans resolve their ambivalence about gift-giving to children.”
“So they go all out designing attractive store windows and turning them into holiday spectacles, and certainly by the late 19th century department stores like Macy’s have elaborate store windows.”
Even Santa Claus got a makeover. Originally he was a benevolent gift-giver who rewarded children who’d been good, Jacobson notes. But he was also a stern disciplinarian who punished bad children by whipping them with switches. Later in the 19th century retailers abandoned the judgmental Santa and made him the jolly gift-giver we know today—the perfect symbol of consumer abundance.
“I think one of the reasons why parents so quickly embraced Santa Claus is because he provided a way of disguising the commercial origins of toys,” Jacobson says. “Santa Claus is one way Americans resolve their ambivalence about gift-giving to children. Parents can supply the more practical, utilitarian gifts or the kinds of toys that are going to be edifying or educational. But Santa Claus can give spectacular gifts with lots of bells and whistles.”
It should probably be no surprise that children and family play a big role in the evolution of Christmas. In middle-class families, Jacobson says, children are a kind of precious burden. “By the mid-19th century the middle-class child, in fact, became a net economic drain, but was seen as emotionally priceless,” she says. “And so if you have an emotionally priceless child in this increasingly sentimentalized family it becomes more appropriate to spend money on that child.
“Many people felt you could harmonize a religious observance,” she continues, “with a very family-centered holiday in which the ritual of gift-giving in the parlor became a way of nurturing family ties and affection.”
But what about today? How do we square a religious holiday with scenes of people trampling one another for the chance to buy a cheap TV at a Black Friday sale? Have we traded Santa Claus for Darth Vader? Jacobson says no.
“In the late 19th, early 20th century,” she says, “people overcame their ambivalence, not because they were embracing the dark side of excessive commercialism, but because they saw the ways in which gift-giving could become attached to other values that they deeply cherished.
“For example, the department store owner John Wanamaker was a religious man, and he created all sorts of spectacles in his stores to lure people in. But at Christmastime he also staged store sing-alongs and printed Christmas hymnals for customers that featured religious carols and included a religious message in them.
“There are all sorts of times in which mass marketers have tried to create new holidays in the interest of creating a new season for spending. But those don’t always succeed,” Jacobson adds. “The ones that succeed do so because they become wedded to other kinds of traditional values. That’s why I think big holiday spending is not so much about giving into the dark side, but rather convincing yourself that you’re not giving into the dark side.”
Source: UC Santa Barbara