High school students need the tools to understand the political implications of reading classic literature like Shakespeare and Hemingway in school, a new study argues.
“As a field, we need to think about how our disciplines are advancing certain stories, silencing certain stories, and socializing our students to think that what we’re teaching them is neutral,” says Jeanne Dyches, assistant professor in Iowa State University’s School of Education. “We need to have a conversation around why certain texts are taught year after year.”
The titles often at the top of high school reading lists are considered “classics” or required for “cultural literacy,” she says. However, the authors—typically white European men—do not reflect the diversity of students in the classroom.
Dyches says assigning these texts without questioning issues of race or gender may exclude students who do not see themselves in the text, and make them feel their voices are not valued. This lack of questioning also normalizes the experiences of students who belong to dominant groups.
Messages of power and oppression
That is why Dyches encourages educators to consider the ideology ingrained in the texts they assign, and give students the tools to question what they are reading. For a new paper, which appears in Harvard Educational Review, Dyches spent time in a high school literature class teaching students to critically examine and question the discipline of English language arts.
“…you’re being just as political when you assign Macbeth as when you assign The Hate U Give.”
Students reviewed more than a century’s worth of national studies on the titles most commonly taught, national and local standards for recommended readings, as well as local and state curriculum policies. The high school was located in a predominately white, suburban Midwest community.
Her research found the lessons sharpened students’ awareness and recognition of messages of power and oppression within classic literature. By the end of the study, 77 percent of students—a 27 percent increase—recognized the politicized nature of teaching these traditional texts. Dyches says while most students were uncomfortable talking about oppression and injustice in a specific text, students of color demonstrated more awareness of these issues.
“We all have different experiences and reactions when we’re having conversations that challenge us to question and consider race, gender, and sexuality and all the messy intersections,” Dyches says.
“It’s OK for students who have never heard these things to still be grappling with their own racial understanding and social-cultural identity. But we must still create opportunities for students to learn, wrestle with, and apply new critical lenses to their educational experiences and the world around them.”
‘I can’t relate to this’
Dyches surveyed students at the beginning and end of the study to understand their perceptions and relationships with the texts they were reading in literature class. In their responses, students described the texts as “bland and ineffective,” adding that they “can’t relate to any of it,” yet they still considered the titles to be “timeless” and important “to improve upon their reading and writing skills.” Dyches says students read the texts because they believed doing so would prepare them for college.
Their responses illustrate a commonly held belief about the “value” of classic literature, which is based more on tradition than literary standards, Dyches says. The problem is students and educators alike do not think to question why this is the case. In fact, Dyches says until she started researching social justice issues, she was unaware of the historical perspectives and ideologies she promoted through the texts she assigned.
Dyches wants to empower students to question what they’re reading in class, and for teachers to recognize the political context of their decisions. Educators, like all people, have different biases or beliefs, Dyches says. However, if teachers know this and address those biases in the classroom, she says that is a step in the right direction.
“We’re all political beings and whether you recognize it or not, you’re always teaching from your belief systems. It’s essential to recognize and understand how our ideas or beliefs influence our teaching. I would argue you’re being just as political when you assign Macbeth as when you assign The Hate U Give,” Dyches says.
How to keep the classics
After working with students to identify the political structures in literature, Dyches asked students to tell the story from a different perspective and bring marginalized voices into the conversation. She says the assignment challenged students and forced them to think about how the changes affected the story or how they comprehended the story.
For example, students rewrote Romeo and Juliet to address race by making Romeo and Juliet an interracial couple. In the paper, Dyches describes how the students incorporated social media into the story as the characters used Twitter to write “love tweets,” creating a national social movement documented through the hashtag #lovehasnobounds.
This is one way teachers can continue to teach classic literature—by questioning how race and patriarchy influence the narrative, Dyches says. While the study focused specifically on literature, she would like to see students apply the same critical thinking skills to other disciplines and aspects of their lives.
Source: Iowa State University