Scientists have discovered a chain of events in which the mutation that causes spinal muscular atrophy disrupts motor neurons and their communication with muscle.
The discovery follows US approval in December of the first treatment for the disease that, in its most severe form, remains incurable and fatal in early childhood.
“We are making progress.”
“We are making progress,” says Anne Hart, professor of neuroscience at Brown University and senior author of the new study in the journal eLife.
About one in 8,000 children is born with some form of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in which mutations in both copies of the gene that code for the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein cripples its production. The end result, which the new study helps to explain, is dysfunction of motor neurons that control muscle along with muscle atrophy and weakness.
In the most acute form, Type I, children die by age two as even functions as fundamental as breathing become compromised. With other SMA types patients can live much longer, but they still suffer significant muscle weakness.
It’s a positive sign that spinal cord injections of nusinersen, the newly approved drug, restore some motor function and prolong survival by improving SMN production, Hart says, but researchers can make further and perhaps more lasting headway by understanding how the lack of SMN ultimately undermines muscle function.
“If we can figure out what is going wrong, then maybe we can have combinatorial therapies—one that raises SMN levels and one that helps neurons survive the challenge of too little SMN.”
Last year, Hart’s lab published evidence that one mechanistic consequence of the disease is a disruption of the process by which neurons can recycle and reuse proteins needed for neural control of muscle.
Experiments described in the new study identify another mechanism. Led by graduate student Patrick O’Hern, researchers uncovered a complex cause-and-effect sequence in both C. elegans worm and mouse models of SMA. A lack of SMN hinders the working of a protein called Gemin3. That, in turn, lessens the activity of a particular microRNA, which turns out to be needed to prevent the overexpression of a motor neuron receptor called m2R.
The role of those receptors is to sense when the neuron has released enough of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine to signal a muscle cell to move. With too many m2R receptors because of their overexpression in SMA, motor neurons may be too sensitive to their acetylcholine output and consequently shut off its release prematurely. That may be severely undermining the effectiveness of the motor neuron signal and therefore proper muscle function.
The link between the disease and the regulation of protein translation that microRNA provides was the Gemin3 protein. O’Hern had noticed that in some studies Gemin3 interacted with SMN and in other studies it was wrapped up in a complex of proteins that interact with microRNA.
“He pulled those ideas together and said what if loss of SMN perturbs Gemin3 and that has consequences for the microRNAs,” Hart says.
The scientists not only traced this whole mechanism, but also showed that they could address it at several stages along the way, restoring healthy neuron development and muscle function in the worms. In lab tests at the University of Cologne in Germany, with mouse motor neurons, moreover, they found that when they added the m2R-blocking drug methoctramine, they could restore crucial benchmarks of motor neuron function and health.
The m2R receptors therefore are a new potential target for treating the disease, Hart says. But only more work will tell whether that’s true for more than just in worms and mouse tissue.
“If you decrease the activity of these receptors, it could be beneficial,” she says. “This needs to be tried in other models, too.”
The SMA Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, Cure SMA, and Deutsche Forschungsgemeineschaft funded the work.
Source: Brown University