Can passive exposure speed up learning?

(Credit: Getty Images)

Learning a new skill takes deliberate practice over time, but passive exposure to the subject matter at hand can help speed up the process, new research in mice suggests.

The finding, which builds on past research in humans, shows how passive exposure can be a valuable tool for learning. It helps explain how watching movies in a foreign language might supplement grammar drills and vocabulary flashcards, or how listening to recordings of a professional playing piano concertos could help budding musicians improve their own craft.

The study gives additional insight into the possible brain mechanisms behind the effect, helping scientists understand just why passive exposure is so powerful, says James Murray, a neuroscientist who led the study alongside fellow neuroscientist Santiago Jaramillo, both of the University of Oregon.

Because it’s much easier to study what’s happening inside the brain of a rodent than a human, “studying how both active training and passive exposure affect learning in mice opens up exciting possibilities for investigating the neural mechanisms underlying the interplay between them,” Murray adds.

To study how mice learn, the researchers trained the animals to reach for a reward in a particular spot in response to tones that slid up or down in pitch. All of the mice were put through an active training protocol, in which they got feedback on their performance so they knew whether they made the right choice. Some of the mice also got passive exposure, where they heard the sounds while they weren’t engaged in the task.

The mice who were passively exposed to the sounds in addition to being actively trained learned how to select the reward location more quickly, the researchers found. It didn’t seem to matter whether the passive exposure happened at the beginning of training or was interspersed in small chunks throughout the active training sessions.

Then, to better understand how the learning might be happening in the brain, the researchers trained and tested different artificial neural networks on a simulated version of the learning task. Neural networks, a kind of machine learning algorithm, process information in a way that mimics the way the brain processes information.

Artificial neurons represent real neurons, and learning takes place by modifying the strengths of the connections between those neurons. They’re not a direct replica for the brain, but they can be used to generate hypotheses that can then be tested experimentally.

The modeling suggests that passive exposure to a stimulus lays the groundwork in the brain, creating a hidden representation of that stimulus that captures its most prominent features, like making a pencil outline before diving into a detailed painting. Then, during active learning, the brain links the stimulus to particular behaviors. With passive exposure, the brain is primed to make those connections more quickly.

In the future, the team hopes to record brain activity in mice during a similar learning task, to see if their predictions play out.

While the research was done using a simple task in mice, the findings might also have implications for more complex learning in humans, the researchers suggest.

Study coauthor Melissa Baese-Berk, a former University of Oregon linguist now at the University of Chicago, has previously published studies showing how passive exposure can help adult humans better learn to understand new speech sounds.

“Alongside the previous work on humans from Melissa and her collaborators, our results suggest that, in mice and in humans, a given performance threshold can be achieved with relatively less effort by combining low-effort passive exposure with active training,” Murray says.

“This insight could be helpful for humans learning an instrument or a second language, though more work will be needed to better understand how this applies to more complex tasks and how to optimize training schedules that combine passive exposure with active training.”

The researchers describe their findings in a paper in the journal eLife.

Source: University of Oregon