Despite fewer crimes, millennials face more arrests

Millennials are more likely to be arrested than their predecessor counterparts regardless of self-reported criminal activity, according to a new study.

Furthermore, black men who self-reported no offenses were 419 percent more likely to be arrested at the beginning of the 21st century than non-offending blacks of the previous generation, and 31.5 percent more likely to be arrested than whites of the same generation who did not self-report any crimes.

The study, which appears in RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, demonstrates the effects the rise of proactive policing practices and increased targeting of minor infractions had on an entire generation, the researchers say.

“The idea that there’s a direct link between committing a crime and having contact with the criminal justice system is essential to public policy, political rhetoric, and criminology, and the assumption is rarely questioned,” says first author Vesla Weaver, associate professor of political science and sociology at Johns Hopkins University.

“However, our study found that there is a loosening relationship between actually committing a crime and being arrested for the millennial generation, something that was not true for the previous generation, Gen X.”

It is important to note, however, that the analysis is limited and does not capture all possible members of each generation. For the purposes of this research, those who were between 18 and 23 years old in 1980 and 2002 are defined as Gen-Xers and millennials, respectively. The analysis does not capture later-born millennials and Gen-Xers.

Millennials had much more contact with police even though their Gen-X predecessors reported more offenses.

To Weaver’s knowledge, this study is the first of its kind to examine how the relationship between reported criminality and involvement with law enforcement has shifted across generations.

Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, a nationally-representative survey sample of more than 8,000 young adults that asked respondents to self-report crimes committed and experiences with various arms of the criminal justice system, including police, courts, and correctional institutions.

The researchers included 5,837 and 8,683 respondents ages 18 to 23 years old from the 1979 and 1997 cohorts, respectively. Researchers chose these two generational cohorts to represent groups that were on either side of a dramatic change in policing, more attention to low-level crimes, and greater resources being spent on the criminal justice system.

The results show that millennials had much more contact with police even though their Gen-X predecessors reported more offenses; police arrested only 10 percent of young adults in the 1979 group even though 52 percent reported committing at least one crime (not including drug use), but police arrested 25 percent of the same age group in 1997, even though only 15 percent reported committing at least one crime (not including drug use).

Millennials overall were more likely to report being arrested, absent of committing a crime, than the previous generation. For the 1979 group, 18 percent of those who reported being arrested also reported no offending, whereas 70 percent of the 1997 group reported so.

Race particularly exacerbates this disparity. In 1979, blacks and whites both self-reported committing the same number of crimes and being arrested at similar rates, for all surveyed crimes. In 1997, however, black men were more likely to face arrest, absent of committing a crime, than white men who actually reported committing a crime.

The impacts of arrest are enduring, as studies have shown that arrest is associated with lower earnings, greater chance of unemployment, lower educational attainment, and a higher likelihood of continued involvement with the criminal justice system. The clearly disproportionate rate of black arrests further perpetuates racial inequity, the researchers say.

“Our reform strategy should not only focus on decreasing punitive interventions but on realigning exposure to arrest with criminal offending,” Weaver adds.

Source: Johns Hopkins University