Scientists with little time and almost no funding created a “Midnight Scan Club” in their quest to analyze the unique features of individual human brains.
Most efforts to analyze connections involve scanning many brains and averaging the data across groups of people. For this study, the researchers used brain-imaging techniques to evaluate brain networks that control speech and motor function, among other activities. The researchers examined individuals while resting and performing cognitive tasks such as reading.
Their aim was to better understand the inner-workings of individual people’s brains by compiling hours and hours of data collected on 10 adults—a group of study subjects that included two of the researchers themselves. Their work led to 10 high-fidelity, individual-specific connectomes—detailed maps of neural brain connections that reveal spatial and organizational variability in brain networks, and that may one day be helpful in determining personalized treatments for brain-related disorders.
The research appears in the journal Neuron. The dataset is available as a resource for neuroscientists so they can plumb the information for further discoveries about brain circuitry.
Less blurry, less blotchy
“We’d like to be able to provide personalized medicine using neuroimaging to treat people with seizures, migraines, and depression.”
“Using this approach, we might one day be able to obtain brain-function maps of patients and individualize neuropsychiatric and medical treatments based on specific features of their brain networks,” says Nico Dosenbach, an assistant professor of pediatric and developmental neurology at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.
“We’d like to be able to provide personalized medicine using neuroimaging to treat people with seizures, migraines, and depression.
“This is also exciting for basic neuroscience because these individual maps look quite a bit different from the currently available standard group maps,” Dosenbach says. “We learned that spatial averaging destroys all the fine features of our brain organization, kind of like what happens when you average photos of several peoples’ faces. Everything gets blurred and blotchy.”
Over the past 25 years, neurologists have averaged MRI data across groups of people as a way to approximate human brain organization.
“We wanted to take a different approach,” explains Dosenbach, who also treats patients at St. Louis Children’s Hospital. “Averaging brain data across many individuals has allowed scientists to learn a lot about brain function. But compiling data on an individual level invites opportunities for precision. The goal is to find individual variations that may play a role in neurological diseases, from migraines to Alzheimer’s to brain injuries.”
Loud, unpleasant nights
Dosenbach and his colleagues collected MRI images of 10 individuals and analyzed how nerve cells function in individual brains. They used two types of magnetic resonance imaging: functional MRI, which pinpoints the parts of the brain most active during specific cognitive activities; and resting-state functional connectivity, to explore neural connections while the brain is not actively engaged in a task.
“Our motto became ‘Carpe noctem,’ or ‘Seize the night.'”
Getting such images, however, presented challenges—among them, finding committed volunteers to undergo hours of loud, unpleasant brain imaging, and finding a way around the high demand for and cost of MRI machines for the research.
“The major downside of getting massive amounts of imaging data per person is its great cost,” Dosenbach says. “And as a new faculty member, I was extremely short on funding. In addition, the scanner was mostly booked throughout the day, every day.”
Undeterred, Dosenbach and his research partner, Steve Nelson, then a research scientist in psychology at Washington University, brainstormed for weeks before Nelson discovered that the fee for one of the university’s research scanners, which at the time was about $600 per hour, was reduced by 90 percent after midnight.
“Our motto became ‘Carpe noctem,’ or ‘Seize the night,’ ” Dosenbach says.
As founding members of the Midnight Scan Club, Dosenbach and Nelson—now a neuroimaging director at the US Department of Veterans Affairs in Waco, Texas, and a research assistant professor at Baylor University in Waco and the University of Texas at Dallas—scanned their brains first, subjecting themselves to 12 nightly, two-hour sessions.
The two then recruited eight volunteers—male and female graduate students and junior-level faculty in their mid-20s to mid-30s.
“The study wasn’t easy,” Dosenbach says. “We were already stretched thin professionally, and the MRI experience was unpleasant and it was hard to stay awake. And we had personal lives, too. At the time, I had a toddler, and my wife was seven months pregnant. It was a big sacrifice for her to have me gone for much of the day and the night, and then for me to be napping when I was home.”
However, the strategy proved budget-friendly, costing a total of $12,000 instead of about $125,000 had they performed the scans during the day.
Dosenbach’s brain is different
Their analysis—led by first author Evan Moss Gordon, an investigator at the US Department of Veterans Affairs in Waco, and Timothy O. Laumann, a resident in psychiatry at Barnes-Jewish Hospital—revealed several variations in brain organization among the group.
“What does it mean that my brain is different?” he asks. “I don’t know…”
For example, in most individuals the entire brain network forms a giant loop; however, in two of the study participants, including Dosenbach, the brain as a whole showed more linear connections.
“What does it mean that my brain is different?” he asks. “I don’t know, however, it’s generally believed that a circular network increases efficiency of information processing.”
He compares the scenario to two drivers who choose different routes to the same destination. One hops on the freeway and arrives quickly; the other meanders the side streets. Both arrive at the same place despite different methods and time frames.
“In future work with larger sample sizes, we hope to clarify which variations in neural connections affect behavior and which do not,” Dosenbach says.
The dataset also may help neurologists understand and treat brain disorders such as seizures, Dosenbach says. “If we collect more and higher-quality data per subject, we can make precise maps of each person’s functional brain architecture,” he says. “To me, that’s step one toward using those maps to guide us in the care of neurological and psychiatric patients. Our small sample is not diverse, yet the data already has suggested several variations. This may be important for understanding why people respond uniquely to different drug treatments.”
Some inspiration for the project came from the Human Connectome Project, a global effort focused on mapping human brain circuitry through neuroimaging and data-sharing. Dosenbach also says he was inspired by Russell Poldrack, a neuroscientist and psychologist at Stanford University. “Russ was the first to scan himself twice a week for almost 18 months,” Dosenbach says. “We admired his approach and we wanted to expand on it.
“We’ve already had other research groups express interest in mimicking our data-collecting methods, and other research groups want to collaborate on analyzing the data,” he says. “For me, this is a paradigm shift in the field of neuroimaging. I am excited to see where this will lead us in our quest to uncover the mysteries of the human brain.”
Funding came from the National Institutes of Health; the Jacobs Foundation; the Child Neurology Foundation; the McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience; the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology; the Hope Center for Neurological Disorders; an American Psychological Association dissertation research award; and Dart Neuroscience LLC.