Sending a weak alternating electrical current through electrodes attached to the scalp markedly improved depression symptoms in about 70 percent of participants in a small clinical study.
The research lays the groundwork for larger research studies to use a specific kind of electrical brain stimulation called transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to treat people diagnosed with major depression, researchers say.
“We conducted a small study of 32 people because this sort of approach had never been done before,” says Flavio Frohlich, associate professor of psychiatry at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, director of the Carolina Center for Neurostimulation, and senior author of the paper in Translational Psychiatry.
“Now that we’ve documented how this kind of tACS can reduce depression symptoms, we can fine tune our approach to help many people in a relatively inexpensive, noninvasive way.”
Frohlich’s tACS approach differs from the more common brain stimulation technique called transcranial direct stimulation (tDCS), which sends a steady stream of weak electricity through electrodes attached to various parts of the brain. That approach has had mixed results in treating various conditions, including depression.
Frohlich’s tACS paradigm is newer and has not been investigated as thoroughly as tDCS. The approach focuses on each individual’s specific alpha oscillations, which appear as waves between 8 and 12 Hertz on an electroencephalogram (EEG).
The waves in this range rise in predominance when we close our eyes and daydream, meditate, or conjure ideas—essentially when our brains shut out sensory stimuli, such as what we see, feel, and hear.
Previous research showed that people with depression featured imbalanced alpha oscillations; the waves were overactive in the left frontal cortex. Frohlich thought his team could target these oscillations to bring them back in sync with the alpha oscillations in the right frontal cortex. And if the team could achieve that, then maybe depression symptoms would decrease.
Four weeks after treatment
His lab recruited 32 people diagnosed with depression and surveyed each participant before the study, according to the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), a standard measure of depression.
Researchers then separated the participants into three groups. One group received the sham placebo stimulation—a brief electrical stimulus to mimic the sensation at the beginning of a tACS session. A control group received a 40-Hertz tACS intervention, well outside the range that the researchers thought would affect alpha oscillations. A third group received the treatment intervention—a 10-Hertz tACS electrical current that targeted each individual’s naturally occurring alpha waves.
Each person underwent their invention for 40 minutes on five consecutive days. None of the participants knew which group they were in, and neither did the researchers, making this a randomized double-blinded clinical study—the gold standard in biomedical research. Each participant took the MADRS immediately following the five-day regimen, at two weeks, and again at four weeks.
Prior to the study, Frohlich set the primary outcome at four weeks, meaning that the main goal of the study was to assess whether tACS could bring each individual’s alpha waves back into balance and decrease symptoms of depression four weeks after the five-day intervention. He set this primary outcome because scientific literature on the study of tDCS also used the four-week mark.
Participants in the 10-Hertz tACS group featured a decrease in alpha oscillations in the left frontal cortex; they were brought back in synch with the right side of the frontal cortex. But the researchers did not find a statistically significant decrease in depression symptoms in the 10-Hertz tACS group, as opposed to the sham or control groups at four weeks.
But when the team looked at data from two weeks after treatment, they found that 70 percent of people in the treatment group reported at least a 50 percent reduction of depression symptoms, according to their MADRS scores, a response rate significantly higher than the one for the two other control groups.
A few of the participants had such dramatic decreases that Frohlich’s team is currently writing case-studies on them. Participants in the placebo and control groups experienced no such reduction in symptoms.
“It’s important to note that this is a first-of-its kind study,” Frohlich says. “When we started this research with computer simulations and preclinical studies, it was unclear if we would see an effect in people days after tACS treatment—let alone if tACS could become a treatment for psychiatric illnesses.
“It was unclear what would happen if we treated people several days in a row or what effect we might see weeks later. So, the fact that we’ve seen such positive results from this study gives me confidence our approach could help many people with depression.”
Frohlich’s lab is currently recruiting for two similar follow-up studies.
The Brain Behavior Research Foundation, National Institutes of Health, the BRAIN Initiative, and the Foundation of Hope funded the work.
Source: UNC-Chapel Hill