Many arctic lakes pose little threat to global carbon levels, at least for now, according to new research.
In the Arctic’s flat, arid regions dotted with thousands of lakes—a landscape that makes up about a quarter of the entire Arctic region—many lakes are functioning like self-contained units, not releasing much carbon dioxide, the researchers report.
The Arctic is warming twice as fast as the rest of the planet. One consequence of that trend is the thawing of permafrost, a layer of Earth that has remained frozen for thousands of years in some areas. This frozen soil and vegetation currently holds more than twice the carbon found in the atmosphere.
As permafrost across northern Alaska, Canada, Siberia, and other high-latitude regions thaws, microbes in the soil consume organic materials, releasing carbon dioxide or methane, an even more potent greenhouse gas, into lakes and the atmosphere.
But a warmer, wetter climate may also cause more carbon from plants on land to move into lakes. Greater flow of carbon from plants and soils into Arctic lakes stimulates greater greenhouse gas emissions from bodies of water. And in a largely unstudied region with millions of lakes, it’s still a mystery as to how much carbon moves from the land into lakes, and ultimately into the atmosphere.
“We found that not all high-latitude lakes are big chimneys of carbon to the atmosphere, and that lakes in the region are not actively processing much permafrost or plant carbon from land,” says lead author Matthew Bogard, a postdoctoral researcher in the School of Environmental and Forest Sciences.
“Documenting the heterogeneous nature of northern lakes, as we have done here, will better define the role of Arctic lakes in the global carbon cycle.”
The study appears in the journal Nature Geoscience.
Lake to lake
The researchers visited 20 lakes several times over the course of a year in the Yukon Flats region of northeast Alaska: a vast, dry landscape speckled with thousands of lakes and home to the Yukon River, North America’s last largest undammed river. Their goal was to track the flow of carbon through the food web and test the water chemistry in each lake for signs of carbon from permafrost across a region that hasn’t been studied before in this way.
Nearly all of the related research has taken place in a handful of isolated areas in the Arctic that don’t necessarily represent the characteristics of lakes in the region, the researchers say.
“The problem that we overcame in this study is getting to some logistically very difficult places in order to get a better picture of what’s happening across the Arctic, which literally has millions of lakes,” says senior author David Butman, assistant professor in the School of Environmental and Forest Sciences. “These findings show the need to better understand the diversity of the ecosystems in this region.”
During each of the fieldwork trips, the research team flew by floatplane from Fairbanks, Alaska to a remote location in the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, an area teeming each summer with migratory ducks and other waterfowl.
Their accommodations were modest: an old hunting cabin that the US Fish and Wildlife Service now maintains for field research provided a safe place to sleep, cook, charge equipment, and filter water after long days in the field. Black bears and moose are common in this area, evidenced by large spikes on the cabin’s doors and windows to keep animals out.
Each day the researchers flew from lake to lake, collecting water samples while kneeling on the plane’s pontoons and dropping probes into the water to measure temperature, dissolved oxygen, and other lake characteristics. On a good day, two researchers and a pilot could hit eight different lakes, sometimes having to leave one person behind for part of the day if the lakes were too shallow to take off with a fully weighted plane.
In their analyses, the researchers found that nearly every lake they tested showed no sign of ancient carbon from permafrost, and much less production of carbon dioxide than expected.
Lakes emit carbon dioxide when it enters from outside sources in the landscape, such as rivers and groundwater. Also, bacteria and animals produce it while digesting their food, and carbon dioxide can build up if they generate it faster than plants and algae can suck it up during photosynthesis.
But here, the research team saw evidence that many of the lakes were more balanced in production and uptake of carbon dioxide than lakes in other regions. Consequently, the lakes were a smaller source of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere than is observed in other parts of the world.
“The implications are that not all lakes are hot spots for releasing carbon from land,” Butman says. “But we don’t yet know how these particular landscapes will change in a warmer climate, since this is the first time they’ve been studied.”
As the climate warms, scientists expect large wildfires to sweep across the Yukon Flats, potentially delivering an enormous load of land carbon to the lakes in this landscape that could stimulate more carbon dioxide emissions. The research team’s current and future work will help benchmark what’s happening now to better understand future changes.
Additional coauthors are from the University of Washington; Florida State University; and the US Geological Survey.
The NASA Arctic-Boreal Vulnerability Experiment; the University of Washington; the US Geological Survey; the Quebec (Canada) Research Fund Postdoctoral Scholarship program; and the US Permafrost Association funded the study.
Source: University of Washington