Why abbreviations can be bad for science

(Credit: Getty Images)

“Abbreviations are meant to be shortcuts, but they end up alienating people,” says Kipling Williams, a professor of social psychology at Purdue University who has studied ostracism for more than 20 years.

In a recent article, Williams and colleagues offer fellow scientists some advice: stop using abbreviations when communicating about science. They say acronyms and other abbreviations can alienate people who aren’t experts.

“By not using abbreviations and adding just a few extra syllables we can bring everyone in the loop.”

“It’s not that people are trying to be exclusive. They just mistakenly assume other people know. We suggest it’s better to err on the side that they don’t know and avoid using abbreviations, especially when writing and promoting research.

“This attempt to be efficient is more likely to make people feel excluded and ignored, much like we see in ostracism research, and this could hinder efforts in sharing scientific findings across disciplines and with the general public.”

Williams, along with graduate student Andrew H. Hales and alumnus Joel Rector, offer the advice in an article for the Association for Psychological Science’s APS Observer. Abbreviations can include acronyms or initialisms, such as DARPA, ANOVA and MPA, which are Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, analysis of variance and Midwestern Psychological Association, respectively.

Scientific papers have more impact if they’re ‘stories’

Another reason scientists use abbreviations is because they give insiders a cohesiveness, but at the expense of others. The Purdue researchers say there is an easy solution; don’t use abbreviations.

“We know from ostracism research that seemingly trivial items can make people feel ignored and excluded,” says Hales, a doctoral student in psychological sciences. “For example, previous research has found that while Christmas displays may seem innocuous, to those who don’t celebrate Christmas it is a reminder of outsider status. Or, when women were asked to read job descriptions for engineering positions, the ideal candidate was described using the male pronoun. By not using abbreviations and adding just a few extra syllables we can bring everyone in the loop.”

Source: Purdue University