MICHIGAN STATE (US)—A city’s size no longer is the key factor in building vibrant local economies. It’s all about connections to other places, a new study suggests.

The rise of commercial aviation, high-speed rail, the Internet, and other technological advances have allowed smaller cities to compete with urban powers such as New York and Chicago, says Michigan State University sociologist Zachary Neal.

His study—published this week in the journal City and Community—identifies Denver, Phoenix, and even Bentonville, Ark.—Wal-Mart’s corporate home—as some of the most well-connected and economically sophisticated communities.

“Fifty years ago, no one would have thought to put a multinational corporation in Bentonville, Ark., when it could be in New York or Chicago or Los Angeles,” says Neal. “But changes in technology have started to level the playing field in terms of what cities can do.”

Neal examined the population and air-traffic data for 64 U.S. cities from 1900 to 2000. He found that a city’s population was the most important factor for its economy until the 1950s, when the spread of commercial air travel fostered more cross-country business networks.

That trend continued with advances such as teleconferencing and the growth of the Internet.

Some large cities—including New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago—built on those networks and maintained their economic clout, according to the study.

Other cities—like Detroit, Cleveland, and Pittsburgh—were unable to effectively capitalize and now are considered “poorly connected.” This holds true for the overall economies of the cities and for specific sectors such as manufacturing and transportation and communication, Neal said.

And then there are communities that recently have developed connections to become “wired towns,” he says. These are smaller cities that were essentially insignificant 50 years ago but have emerged as major economic centers, according to the study.

Wired towns include the Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina—which pooled its regional resources to focus on innovation and creativity—and Miami, which took advantage of its location to serve as the primary link between North, Central, and South America.

Neal says the findings could help city planners and officials better formulate plans to stimulate their local economies by helping them know where to focus their efforts.

“Just attracting more residents won’t have much effect,” he says. “But building relationships with other cities both near and far, for example through business partnerships or more nonstop flights, can go a long way.”

In the next 50 years, Neal adds, the most important factor in local economies may very well shift again—possibly to one based on the environmental sustainability of cities.

“The transition from a size-based hierarchy to one rooted in networks shows that this is a fluid structure,” Neal says.

More news from Michigan State: http://news.msu.edu/