U. TEXAS-AUSTIN (US) — Female cognitive ability can limit how melodious or handsome males become over evolutionary time, new research shows.
Males across the animal world have evolved elaborate traits to attract females—from huge peacock tails to complex bird songs and frog calls. But what keeps them from getting more colorful feathers, longer tails, or more melodious songs?[audio:https://www.futurity.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/male-tungara-frog-chorus.mp3]
(AUDIO: Listen to a chorus of male túngara frogs attracting females with their distinct “whine” and “chuck” calls.)
Predators, for one. Increased elaboration can draw predators in, placing an enormous cost to males with these sexy traits. In a new paper appearing in Science, a group of biologists have shown that females themselves also can limit the evolution of increased elaboration.
Studying neotropical túngara frogs, they found that females lose their ability to detect differences in male mating calls as the calls become more elaborate.
“We have shown that the female túngara frog brains have evolved to process some kinds of information and not others,” says Mike Ryan, professor of integrative biology at the University of Texas at Austin, “and that this limits the evolution of those signals.”
Imagine looking at a group of five oranges next to a group of six. At a glance, you would quickly notice that one group has one more orange than the other. Now, imagine looking at a pile of 100 oranges next to a pile of 101. It would be nearly impossible for you to notice the difference in size (one orange) between those two piles at a glance.
This is known as Weber’s Law, which states that stimuli are compared based on proportional differences rather than absolute differences (one orange in the case above).
In túngara frogs, males gather en masse to attract female frogs with a call that is made up of a longer “whine” followed by one or more short “chucks.”
Through a series of experiments conducted in Panama, Ryan and his collaborators found that females prefer male calls with the most chucks, but their preference was based on the ratio of the number of chucks. As males elaborate their call by adding more chucks, their relative increase in attractiveness decreases due to a perceptual constraint on the part of females.
Male túngara frog calls also attract a predator: the frog eating fringe-lipped bat. To confirm that male song elaboration wasn’t limited by these predators, the researchers also studied how the bats respond to additional “chucks” in the male call.
They discovered that hunting bats choose their prey based on chuck number ratio, just as the female frogs do. So, as males elaborate their call by adding chucks, the relative increase in predation risk decreases with each additional chuck.
“What this tells us is that predation risk is unlikely to limit male call evolution,” says lecturer Karin Akre. “Instead, it is the females’ cognition that limits the evolution of increasing chuck number.”
More news from the University of Texas at Austin: www.utexas.edu/news/