These 2 factors raise risk of birth defect

U. LEEDS (UK) — The two main factors associated with an increased risk of babies being born with a birth defect are being born to an older mother or to parents who are blood relations, new research confirms.

The findings also confirm that socioeconomic status (levels of deprivation) has no effect on the relative risk of birth defects, despite two-thirds of the mothers participating in the study coming from the most deprived fifth of the British population.

Being born to an older mother also increases the risk. Higher levels of maternal education halves the risk of having a baby with a defect across all ethnic groups.

[sources]

It has been known for some time that birth defects, also known as congenital anomalies, are a major cause of infant mortality and that their incidence varies across ethnic groups in the UK.

Other studies in the last 20 years have considered consanguinity (marriage to a blood relation), as a cause of birth defects, but these studies weren’t able to rule out other potential risk factors, particularly the effects of deprivation.

“It is important to note that the vast majority of babies born to couples who are blood relatives are absolutely fine, and whilst consanguineous marriage increases the risk of birth defect from 3 percent to 6 percent, the absolute risk is still small,” says Eamonn Sheridan, geneticist from the University of Leeds.

43 different ethnicities

Published in The Lancet, the study examined detailed information collected about more than 11,300 babies involved in the Born in Bradford (BiB) project, a long term study which is following the health of babies who were born in the city at the Bradford Royal Infirmary between 2007 and 2011. The research team found that the overall rate of birth defects in the BiB babies was approximately 3 percent nearly double the national rate.

Each year, approximately 1.7 percent of babies in England and Wales are born with a birth defect (for example heart or lung problems or recognized syndromes such as Down’s), which may be life-limiting. These disorders occur as a result of complex interactions between genetic and environmental factors, or because of damage done by infections such as rubella and cytomegalovirus.

While the BiB cohort includes a total of 43 different ethnicities, the largest ethnic groups were Pakistani (45 percent) and White British (just under 40 percent).

In the Pakistani subgroup, 77 percent of babies born with birth defects were to parents who were in consanguineous marriages. In the White British subgroup 19 percent of babies with an anomaly were born to mothers over the age of 34. Links between the age of mothers and the prevalence of birth defects are already well-established.

It is estimated that more than a billion people worldwide live in communities where consanguineous marriage is commonplace.

Cultural norms

The study is the first that has been able to explore the potential causes of birth defects in a population where there are enough numbers in both consanguineous and non-consanguineous groups to reach reliable and statistically significant conclusions.

“The research is of particular importance to Bradford, because of the characteristics of its population. Half the babies born in the city’s one maternity hospital have a parent whose family origins are in Pakistan,” says co-author Neil Small, professor at the University of Bradford.

“But the findings also have relevance to other areas of the UK and across the world in countries where consanguineous marriage is a cultural norm.

“In Bradford, there are initiatives that seek to raise community awareness and services such as genetic counseling and testing in place that can be accessed by couples who are married or considering marriage to a blood relative. It is not our intention to counsel couples about who they choose to marry,” Small says.

“But we do want to ensure that couples are aware of any risks so that they can make informed choices when planning their families.”

The NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Leeds, York, and Bradford funded the study.

Source: University of Leeds