This hot process revives soil after oil spills

"Reclaimed soil may not necessarily be used to grow food, but it certainly could be used for re-greening: planting grass to minimize erosion and to restore vegetation," says Pedro Alvarez. (Credit: zendritic/Flickr)

Scientists are using a process called pyrolysis to clean soil contaminated by oil spills in a way that saves energy and reclaims the soil’s fertility.

Pyrolysis involves heating contaminated soils in the absence of oxygen. This approach is much better for the environment than standard incineration techniques for fast remediation, says Rice University environmental engineer Pedro Alvarez.

“Our original goal was to speed the response to oil spills, but our aspiration was to turn contaminated soil into fertile soil,” says Alvarez, professor and chair of the civil and environmental engineering department.

The new paper by Alvarez and colleagues in the journal Environmental Science and Technology demonstrates how they’ve done just that.

From hydrocarbons to char

Offshore oil spills tend to get the most attention, Alvarez says, but 98 percent of spills—more than 25,000 per year—occur on land. Industry and governments worldwide spend more than $10 billion annually to clean up oil spills.

The team found that pyrolyzing contaminated soil for three hours not only reduced the amount of petroleum hydrocarbons left to well below regulatory standards (typically less than 0.1 percent by weight), but also enhanced the soil’s fertility by turning the remaining carbon into beneficial char.

“We initially thought we could turn the hydrocarbons into biochar,” Alvarez says. “We turned out to be partly wrong: We didn’t get biochar, but [we got] a carbonaceous material that we call char and resembles coke.

“But we were correct in thinking that by removing toxic pollutants and the hydrophobicity that repels water that plants need, and by retaining some of the carbon and perhaps some of the nutrients, we would enhance plant growth,” he says.

Lettuce tests

The researchers proved that by successfully growing lettuce in reclaimed soil in the lab. “There’s no one plant officially accepted as the standard for testing petroleum toxicity, but lettuce has been accepted by the community as very sensitive to toxins, especially petroleum,” says graduate student Julia Vidonish, the paper’s lead author.

“Reclaimed soil may not necessarily be used to grow food, but it certainly could be used for re-greening: planting grass to minimize erosion and to restore vegetation,” Alvarez says.

“Our process is part thermal desorption, but it takes advantage of petroleum chemistry,” says chemical engineer and coauthor Kyriacos Zygourakis. “By heating the contaminated soils to about 420 degrees Celsius in the absence of oxygen, we first drive out the lighter hydrocarbons. That’s the desorption part.

“But when the temperature gets above 350 degrees, the high-molecular-weight hydrocarbons, the resins and asphaltenes, undergo a series of cracking and condensation reactions to form solid char, similar to the petroleum coke produced in refineries.

“We leave some of the hydrocarbons in the treated soil but in a solid, more benign form,” he says. “The Environmental Protection Agency does not classify petroleum coke as hazardous waste. If, on the other hand, you want to remove everything, you have to raise the temperature even higher and introduce oxygen to incinerate the char. But you destroy the soil and use 40 to 60 percent more energy.”

Not just desert sand

The char produced by pyrolyzing oil-soaked soil is different from biochar, says biogeochemist and coauthor Caroline Masiello. Where biochar is a particle unto itself, the coke-like char appears to coat existing soil particles.

“Biochar is a particle that is separate from the soil’s mineral grains,” she says. “It has an internal physical structure that allows it to hold water and nutrients and provides a home for microbes, but here, we’re not making any of those things. We’re making an organic film that coats the minerals.”


Vidonish says the process is scalable and should work with existing remediation equipment. “Incineration and thermal desorption are established technologies, and while this is different, there are similarities,” she says. “We expect companies can take a mobile, field-scale thermal desorption unit and make a couple of modifications to do pyrolysis.”

“We proved we can remove all the bad actors and all the contaminants and at the same time have a final product with agricultural value,” Zygourakis says. “We don’t just turn it into desert sand.”

Much work remains to optimize the process, Vidonish says. “Moving forward, we want to understand how the pyrolysis time and the temperature affect the quality of the char in the soil,” she says.

Zygourakis is professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering and a professor of bioengineering. Masiello is an associate professor of Earth science.

Chevron and the National Science Foundation supported the research.

Source: Rice University