Superconductivity in iron compound


The Fourier transform movie of the conductance images reveals the highly C2-symmetric structure of the QPI patterns. The data shown here are from a larger 94nm-square FOV. Six dispersing peaks are clearly visible. The two center peaks disperse in a hole-like fashion and along the b-axis only. (Credit: Davis lab)

CORNELL—A surprising discovery of electronic liquid crystal states in an iron-based, high-temperature superconductor is another step toward understanding superconductivity and using it in such applications as power transmission.

“Because these findings appear similar to what we have observed in the parent state of [copper-based] superconductors, it suggests this could represent a common factor in the mechanism for high-temperature superconductivity in these two otherwise very different families of materials,” says team leader J.C. Séamus Davis, Cornell University’s J.D. White Distinguished Professor of Physical Sciences and director of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Center for Emergent Superconductivity.

The researchers describe their findings in the journal Science.

Many theorists had expected the iron-based materials to act more like conventional metal superconductors, where electrons pair up to carry current effortlessly but without requiring any specific spatial arrangements of the atoms in the metal. These materials conduct electricity with zero resistance only at temperatures near absolute zero, or -270 degrees Celsius (-454 Fahrenheit).

Cuprate, or copper-based, and newly discovered iron-based superconductors operate at a range of warmer, though still chilly, temperatures (up to -120 degrees Celsius or -184 Fahrenheit for cuprates and -220 degrees Celsius or -364 Fahrenheit for iron-based compounds) that make them potentially more practical for such large-scale, real-world applications as zero-loss power transmission lines.

Cuprates are oxides of copper “doped” with various other atoms. Iron-based superconductors—first demonstrated only in 2008—are mostly doped compounds of iron and arsenic. Somehow the doping distorts the crystal structure of the material in a way that makes it possible for electrons to flow without resistance. Understanding how this works could open the door to engineering even higher-temperature, or ideally, room-temperature, versions.


STM scan showing a 96-nanometer square of an iron-based superconductor shows electrons lined up in parallel rows suggesting a ‘liquid-crystal’ state of the electron fluid. The parallel arrangements appear in random domains across the entire crystal, oriented either vertically or horizontally. The diagonal line across this image is the boundary between two domains. The discovery of this arrangement indicates that the mechanism of iron-based superconductors is more complex than previously believed, and may be similar to the mechanism in cuprates. (Credit: Davis lab)

The scientists used a specially built scanning tunneling microscope (STM) in Davis’ lab at Cornell, in which a tiny probe is moved across a surface in steps smaller than the width of an atom. By varying a current flowing between the probe and the surface, Davis is able to read out a spectrum of the energy levels of electrons in the material and produce a picture of the distribution of the electrons.

Davis and colleagues examined “underdoped” samples of a compound of calcium, iron, cobalt, and arsenic that becomes a superconductor when the amount of cobalt doping is increased. The particular material they used, made by Paul Canfield at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Ames Laboratory in Iowa, was a crucial choice, Davis says, because it could be sliced to produce an atomically flat and perfectly debris-free surface needed for the STM techniques.

It became clear to the team that they were on to something very different than expected. They observed static, nanoscale lineups of electrons spanning about eight times the distance between individual iron atoms, all aligned along one axis of the underlying crystal, reminiscent of the way molecules line up in a liquid crystal.

Liquid crystals, used in electronic displays, are a sort of intermediate state between liquid and solid in which molecules line up in parallel rows that can control the passage of light. In the solid crystals of materials like high-temperature superconductors, electrons do not remain attached to individual atoms but behave like a fluid, and here, Davis says, the electrons seem to be in a state analogous to a liquid crystal. “You can’t use ordinary solid-state physics to understand materials this complicated,” he adds.

The scientists also found that the electrons that are free to travel through the material do so in a direction perpendicular to these aligned electronic liquid crystal states. This indicates that the electrons carrying the current are distinct from those apparently aligned in the electronic liquid crystals.

The next step will be to see how these conditions affect the superconductivity of the material when it is transformed to a superconductor.

The observations are “amazingly similar” to what Davis and his team have seen in cuprates. “If we’re able to relate our observations in the iron-based superconductors to what happens in cuprate superconductors, it may help us understand the overall mechanism for high-temperature superconductivity in all of these materials. That understanding could, in turn, help us to engineer new materials with improved superconducting properties for energy applications,” Davis says.

Scientists from the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory at Florida State University and St. Andrews University, Scotland, collaborated on this research, funded by DOE’s Office of Science; the National Science Foundation; the Office of Naval Research; the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; and the Scottish Funding Council.

Cornell University news:

Related Articles