U. NOTTINGHAM (UK) — A radical right-leaning political party is gaining ground in the U.K. on an anti-immigration platform, following a trend seen in Austria, France, and Italy.
In the recent Oldham by-election, the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) confirmed its status as the fourth largest party in British politics, ahead of the British National Party (BNP). Now, with the local elections looming, experts say UKIP looks set to become a successful radical right force.
“Our research shows that Euroscepticism is not the whole story where UKIP is concerned,” say voting behavior experts Robert Ford from the the University of Manchester and and Matthew Goodwin from the University of Nottingham. Their analysis of UKIP’s rise is featured in the European Journal of Political Research.
“There’s no doubt the party’s position on Europe is a big factor, but their supporters are increasingly concerned with attitudes more typically associated with the British National Party (BNP). Like far right voters, those who vote UKIP are dissatisfied with the mainstream parties and hostile toward immigration.”
The research is the first of its kind to analyze and understand the attitudes and motives of UKIP supporters. At the 2010 general election, UKIP called for an immediate halt on immigration, the ending of multicultural policies, and a partial ban on the niqab and burqa worn by some Muslim women.
UKIP leader, Nigel Farage, has since given a “cautious welcome” to emulation of his party by the French National Front (FN), one of the most successful radical right parties in Europe.
“Our analysis shows while UKIP does mop up ‘defectors’ from the Tories—upper and middle class voters who largely follow UKIP to lodge their feelings on Europe at European Parliament elections—its appeal in domestic elections is rather different,” says Ford, the lead author.
“In domestic elections like Oldham East, UKIP tends to do best amongst disaffected working class voters, who find UKIP’s populist attacks on immigrants, Muslims, and the political establishment attractive. UKIP appeals to the same kind of voters as the BNP, but may be able to recruit a broader and more sustainable vote base, with UKIP voters outnumbering BNP voters three to one.
“While many voters who agree with the BNP’s political messages, they are turned off by its violent and fascist reputation. UKIP suffers no such legitimacy problems. It is in a position to not only recruit a much broader base of BNP support, but a much more sustainable base.”
The research also shows that due, in part, to its more moderate reputation, UKIP has succeeded in securing the votes of important groups like women, who have traditionally rejected the BNP due to its perceived extremism.
“Until now, getting to grips with UKIP has been extremely difficult due to an absence of any real systematic research,” Goodwin adds. “This is why the party remains something of a puzzle to many.”
In their report, the researchers looked at data gathered from the YouGov online panel in the week prior to the European Parliament Election.
Among other methods, the researchers compared the views of more than 4,306 UKIP in a group of 34,000 randomly interviewed in the 2001 census. It builds on their previous studies of BNP voters.
“Ultimately” adds Goodwin, “our research backs up assertions that UKIP, unlike the BNP, are thought of as a legitimate force in British politics, with access to mainstream media and political elites. Voters who shun the BNP are willing to listen to the same messages when they come from UKIP.
“UKIP may therefore function as a ‘polite alternative’ for voters worried about immigration and Islam, but repelled by the BNP’s public image.”
More news from the University of Nottingham: www.nottingham.ac.uk/news