Post 9/11: Steel that withstands heat

PURDUE U. (US) — Ten years after 9/11, engineers are continuing work to improve the fire safety of buildings, bridges, and other steel structures.

“I want people to understand that in the last 10 years we’ve not been quiet,” says Amit Varma, associate professor of civil engineering at Purdue University. “We’ve been working to make structures better and safer.”


Using a custom heating system and a specialized laboratory for testing large beams and other components, engineers have created models that could be used in designs to improve fire safety.

The findings, published  in a special 9/11 issue of the Journal of Structural Engineering, will be used to potentially update design codes for steel structures and to test and verify computational building-design models.

Building fires may reach temperatures of 1,000 degrees Celsius, or more than 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit. The strength of steel structures drops by about 40 percent when exposed to temperatures exceeding 500 degrees Celsius.

Steel components in buildings are covered with fireproofing materials to resist the effects of extreme heating.

“So the air could be 1,000 degrees in a fire, but the insulated steel might be 500 degrees or less,” Varma says. “However, once the steel gets beyond 600 degrees Celsius, there can be some major problems.”

Varma and colleagues designed a system made up of heating panels to simulate the effects of fire that is currently being tested on full-scale steel columns at Purdue’s Robert L. and Terry L. Bowen Laboratory for Large-Scale Civil Engineering Research. The panels have electrical coils, like giant toaster ovens, and are placed close to surfaces being studied. As the system is used to simulate the effects of fire, test structures are subjected to forces with hydraulic equipment to mimic the loads experienced in real structures.

“We wanted to build an experimental method that engineers can use to study the behavior of buildings in fire using a structures laboratory,” he says. “Most of the previous work has been done in fire laboratories, which don’t have the same experimental resources of a structures lab. We can subject the structures to failure and make more fundamental observations of behavior and failure to build models. Almost no tests or data like we have can be found in the public domain.”

Doctoral student Anil Agrawal led work to create a model that shows precisely what happens to a steel member subjected to fire while forces are applied by the hydraulic cylinders. The model has been found to be accurate when compared to the experimental results from work led by doctoral student Lisa Choe.

“These are very difficult experiments to perform,” Varma says. “Having a dependable model to predict behavior means you don’t have to do as many experiments when testing new designs.”

Wellman led a portion of the work focusing on the effects of fire on a building’s steel-and-concrete floor and its connections to the building. The composite design is the most common type of floor system used in steel structures.

“Conventional wisdom says the presence of concrete floors improves the fire resistance of a building,” Varma says. “We found that this isn’t necessarily true for the worst-case scenario, unless you set out to design the floor specifically to perform well in fire.”

The aim of the research is to learn precisely what happens to the connections between a floor’s steel beams and the building columns. Extreme heat causes the beams to sag.

“When it starts sagging, the question is, how do the connections perform? This has been a big question for the industry,” Varma says.

The researchers analyzed critical joints after a floor system was subjected to extreme heat in a special oven at Michigan State University. Results will be used to help researchers create a model of the steel-concrete floor system.

“It is far more difficult to model a floor system than it is to model columns,” Varma says. “But we will eventually be able to do that.”

Another paper to be published in December in the American Institute of Steel Construction’s Engineering Journal shows how to use the models to create design specifications for columns. The paper was written by Agrawal, who also is involved in modeling the steel columns and the collapse of entire building systems. The work is ongoing.

New design for nuclear power

Varma also has led research to test a new type of design for nuclear power plants. The work focuses on testing structures like those to be used in the Westinghouse Electric Co. AP1000 standard nuclear power plant design. Engineers tested components of an “enhanced shield building” that will contain the plant’s main system components.

The building consists of an inner steel-wall containment vessel and an outer radiation shield made using a technology called steel-concrete-composite construction. Instead of using more conventional reinforced concrete, which is strengthened with steel bars, the steel-concrete approach uses a sandwich of steel plates filled with concrete.

The new design may reduce the cost of building nuclear power plants by speeding construction time. The composite construction method was first used more than a century ago, but no codes or standards for its use in nuclear power plants yet exist, says Varma.

Findings have shown the design withstands the seismic forces that would result from strong earthquakes. Data also indicate the construction method, also called armored construction, could be used to create structures capable of withstanding aircraft or missile attacks.

“When you have steel plates on the inside and on the outside, it’s a structure that would hold up against an aircraft impact or extreme weather events, such as tornados,” Varma says. “Nothing can easily punch through that sort of structure.”

The Bowen lab is one of a handful of facilities where testing can be performed on full-scale structures instead of smaller-scale specimens, yielding more accurate data. The 66,000-square-foot laboratory is equipped with special hydraulic testing equipment and powerful overhead cranes.

The work is funded by the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology, the American Institute of Steel Construction, and the American Iron and Steel Institute.

More news from Purdue University: