0.01-nanometer squeeze improves platinum catalysts

(Credit: Getty Images)

A nanosize squeeze can significantly boost the performance of platinum catalysts that help generate energy in fuel cells, according to a new study.

Researchers bonded a platinum catalyst to a thin material that expands and contracts as electrons move in and out, and found that squeezing the platinum a fraction of a nanometer nearly doubled its catalytic activity. The findings appear in the journal Science.

“Now, mediocre catalysts can become good, and good catalysts can become excellent.”

“In this study, we present a new way to fine-tune metal catalysts at the atomic scale,” says lead author Haotian Wang, a former graduate student at Stanford University now at Harvard University. “We found that ordinary battery materials can be used to control the activity of platinum and possibly for many other metal catalysts.”

The new technique can be applied to a wide range of clean technologies, Wang says, including fuel cells that use platinum catalysts to generate energy, and platinum electrolyzers that split water into oxygen and hydrogen fuel.

New catalyst is a step toward renewable plastics

“Our tuning technique could make fuel cells more energy efficient and increase their power output,” says coauthor Yi Cui, a professor of materials science and engineering at Stanford and of photon science at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. “It could also improve the hydrogen-generation efficiency of water splitters and enhance the production of other fuels and chemicals.”

0.01 nanometer is actually a lot

Catalysts are used to make chemical reactions go faster while consuming less energy. The performance of a metal catalyst depends on its electronic structure—that is, how the electrons orbiting individual atoms are arranged.

“The electronic structure of a catalyst needs to match the molecule of interest in order to achieve the chemical reaction you want,” Wang explains. “You can adjust the electronic structure of a catalyst by compressing the atoms or pulling them apart.”

The team introduced a novel way to compress or separate the atoms by 5 percent, a mere 0.01 nanometer. “That might not seem like much, but it’s really a lot,” Cui says. “How did we achieve that? It’s really a marriage of battery research and catalysis.”

A battery-like electrode

The study focused on lithium cobalt oxide, a material widely used in batteries for cellphones and other electronic devices. The researchers stacked several layers of lithium cobalt oxide together to form a battery-like electrode.

“Applying electricity removes lithium ions from the electrode, causing it to expand by 0.01 nanometer,” Cui says. “When lithium is reinserted during the discharge phase, the electrode contracts to its original size.”

Laser turns graphene into catalyst for fuel cells

For the experiment, the team added several layers of platinum to the lithium cobalt oxide electrode. “Because platinum is bonded to the edge, it expands with the rest of the electrode when electricity is added and contracts during discharge,” Cui says.

Separating the platinum layers a distance of 0.01 nanometer, or 5 percent, had a significant impact on performance, Wang says.

“We found that compression makes platinum much more active,” he says. “We observed a 90 percent enhancement in the ability of platinum to reduce oxygen in water. This could improve the efficiency of hydrogen fuel cells.”

Stretching the electrode by 5 percent had the opposite effect, suppressing oxygen production by 40 percent, Wang says.

“We predicted theoretically some years ago that straining a catalyst can be used to control its performance, and here is the experiment to show that our theory works well,” says coauthor Jens Nørskov, a professor of chemical engineering at Stanford’s SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis.

“Our technology offers a very powerful way to controllably tune catalytic behavior,” Cui adds. “Now, mediocre catalysts can become good, and good catalysts can become excellent.”

The US Department of Energy, the Stanford Global Climate and Energy Project, the Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship Program and the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program supported the work.

Source: Stanford University