U. ROCHESTER (US) — A new way to attack pathogens stops bacteria’s ability to degrade RNA, a “housekeeping” process crucial to their ability to thrive.
In what is believed to be an important step in the ever-escalating battle between man and microbe, scientists were able to stop methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or MRSA both in the laboratory and in infected mice.
Details of the research are reported online in the journal PLoS Pathogens.
The approach shows promise against the most severe strains of MRSA as well as the toughest type of MRSA infection for antibiotics to infiltrate—bacteria enmeshed in biofilms.
“This offers a whole new way to go on the offensive against some of the world’s most dangerous bugs,” says Paul Dunman, associate professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of Rochester.
“We’re hoping our research opens the door to an entirely new class of antibiotics.”
MRSA infections are among the most virulent infections known and can be acquired in the community or in hospitals. They cause nearly 500,000 hospitalizations and 19,000 deaths in the United States each year—more deaths than are caused by AIDS.
MRSA and other dangerous microbes are so deadly largely because of their ability to adapt quickly to changing conditions. Bacteria’s knack for adaptation hinges on their ability to constantly churn out new molecules of RNA, which carry crucial messages that tell a cell what proteins to make and in what quantities.
The new research focuses on a critical cellular step that is part of the process, known as RNA degradation. Once an RNA molecule is no longer needed, the molecule is sliced and diced up, and its components are returned to the pool of available raw material that the cell taps again and again to construct other RNA molecules as needed.
“In bacteria, RNA degradation is crucial. The cells are replicating very quickly and responding to environmental changes very rapidly,” says Dunman.
“In less than three minutes, a new RNA transcript is made, the protein is made, and then the RNA is degraded, and that material is made available to make other RNA molecules.”
The researchers discovered that a molecule known as RnpA is central to the degradation process. After nailing down the activity of RnpA, more than 29,000 compounds were tested in search for one that inhibits it. A small molecule called RNPA1000 was found that brings MRSA nearly to a standstill.
Throwing a monkey wrench into bacteria’s RNA recycling system might harm MRSA in a number of ways. One possibility is that since messenger RNA molecules are not destroyed like they should be, the bacteria are overcome by an array of confusing instructions that should have been turned off. Another possibility is that bacteria are unable to make essential new RNA molecules, since the supply of raw material is not available.
“We believe this basically makes the bacterial cell go haywire. The cell is producing proteins it no longer needs, and it can’t produce proteins that it does need,” says Dunman.
The team found that RNPA1000 is active against the predominant MRSA types circulating in the United States, vancomycin intermediate susceptible S. aureus (VISA) and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA). The compound also shows significant antimicrobial activity against a host of other bugs tested, including Staphylococcus epidermidis, antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.
Especially promising was its activity against MRSA biofilms, whose formation is central to the bacterium’s virulence in medical settings. Today’s antibiotics have a tough time breaking through MRSA biofilms on equipment like catheters, but RNPA1000 brought the bacteria to a halt even when they were ensconced within biofilms.
The agent does not affect other drugs used to treat MRSA infections, including vancomycin, daptomycin, or rifampicin; it does affect oxacillin, making it more potent. That find might make it possible to eventually combine an agent like RNPA1000 with other drugs that also target the infection.
The compound was also moderately effective in mice. In an experiment with infected mice, all of the untreated mice died from their infection, but half the mice survived when treated with a large dose of RNPA1000.
The compound is also somewhat toxic to human cells at the largest doses. Those findings make it unlikely that RNPA1000 itself will end up as an antibiotic and spurred Dunman and colleagues to design safer, more potent alternatives.
“This is a great starting point,” says Dunman. “We’ve identified a compound that is very active against RnpA, and now we can use chemistry to try to increase its potency by hundreds of times, as well as make it less toxic to human cells. We’ve gotten a lead from the drug screen, and now we’re building a better molecule.”
Researchers at Vanderbilt University, the University of Nebraska, the University of Arkansas, and the University of North Texas Health Science Center contributed to the study, that was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the American Heart Association, and the Nebraska Research Initiative.
More news from University of Rochester: www.rochester.edu/news