Crops genetically modified with the bacterium Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) produce proteins that kill pest insects. But steady exposure may allow pests to develop resistance to the proteins, making Bt plants ineffective.
New research shows that the combination of natural enemies, such as ladybird beetles, with Bt crops delays the pests’ ability to evolve resistance to these insecticidal proteins.
“This is the first demonstrated example of a predator being able to delay the evolution of resistance in an insect pest to a Bt crop,” says Anthony Shelton, professor of entomology at Cornell University.
Bt is a soil bacterium that produces proteins that are toxic to some species of caterpillars and beetles when they are ingested, but have been proven safe to humans and many natural enemies, including predaceous ladybirds.
Bt genes have been engineered into a variety of crops to control insect pests.
Since farmers began planting Bt crops in 1996 with 70 million hectares planted in the United States in 2012, there have been only three clear-cut cases in agriculture of resistance in caterpillars and one in a beetle. “Resistance to Bt crops is surprisingly uncommon,” Shelton says.
To delay or prevent insect pests from evolving resistance to Bt crops, the US Environmental Protection Agency promotes the use of multiple Bt genes in plants and the practice of growing refuges of non-Bt plants that serve as a reservoir for insects with Bt susceptible genes.
“Our paper argues there is another factor involved: the conservation of natural enemies of the pest species,” Shelton says. These predators can reduce the number of potentially resistant individuals in a pest population and delay evolution of resistance to Bt.
For the study, published in PLOS ONE, researchers set up large cages in a greenhouse. Each cage contained Bt broccoli and refuges of non-Bt broccoli. They studied populations of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) larvae, a pest of broccoli, and their natural enemies, ladybird beetles (Coleomegilla maculata), for six generations.
Cages contained different combinations of treatments with and without predators, and with and without sprayed insecticides on the non-Bt refuge plants. Farmers commonly spray insecticides on refuge plants to prevent loss by pests, but such sprays can kill predators and prey indiscriminately.
The results showed that diamondback moth populations were reduced in the treatment containing ladybird beetles and unsprayed, non-Bt refuge plants. Also, resistance to Bt plants evolved significantly slower in this treatment.
In contrast, Bt plants with no refuge were completely defoliated in treatments without ladybirds after only four to five generations, showing rapid development of resistance in the pests. In the treatment with sprayed non-Bt refuge plants and predators, diamondback moth populations were reduced, but the larvae more quickly evolved resistance to the Bt plants.
“These results demonstrate the effectiveness of Bt plants in controlling the pest population, the lack of effect of Bt on the predators and the role predators play in delaying resistance to Bt plants in the pest population,” Shelton says.
Researchers at the University of Melbourne contributed to the study, which was funded by the US Department of Agriculture and the Special Research Projects for Developing Transgenic Plants in China.
Source: Cornell University