MICHIGAN STATE (US) — Threats from non-Native Americans may require a change in tribal membership codes to allow tribes to protect themselves, says one legal expert in a new study.
Domestic violence against Native American women and pollution of American Indian land—mostly at the hands of non-Native Americans—are just two of many issues that could destroy the American Indian way of life, says Michigan State University law professor Matthew Fletcher.
Socio-economic and environmental problems are at an all-time high, says Fletcher, whose findings were recently published in Wyoming Law Review.
A member of an Ojibwe tribe performs a traditional dance at an Ojibwe pow wow. (Credit: Michigan State University)
“To exclude every single person from tribal membership because they’re not Indian is going to harm tribes in the long run,” says Fletcher, who is a member of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians.
“Tribes can actually be a domestic nation that can exercise the necessary government authority over all the people in their territory. But in order to do that, they have to liberalize their membership criteria.”
And it’s not going to be easy, since federal law usually defines Native Americans by blood quantum or lineage—often quarter-blood American Indian. Everyone else: Non-American Indian. Supreme Court opinions on membership haven’t strayed from that law, linking voting to tribal jurisdiction.
But some tribes are being overrun by non-Native Americans, Fletcher says, so this view is becoming obsolete. Now tribal nonmembers reside in a political limbo, essentially immune from regulation.
“I’m not saying throw out the whole ancestry or blood quantum criteria. I’m saying come up with something new to bring in the people who can cause the most damage to you,” Fletcher adds.
With 565 tribes around the country, American Indians are economically important, he said. In Michigan alone, tribes generate more than $1 billion of economic activity from casinos.
In addition, Fletcher says Native Americans are underutilized environmental stewards. They’re more invested in the environment than the EPA and the states and could be key to saving the Great Lakes—if they had the authority to punish the polluters.
But American Indians must be more aggressive with nonmembers, he says. A non- American Indian working for a tribe should consent to tribal jurisdiction, as well as anyone living on Native American land. This consent is no different than requiring noncitizens to seek a visa or a work permit from a host country, Fletcher adds.
“Most nations around the world adopt membership rules and criteria without regard to race and ancestry, and Indian nations should do the same,” he says. “For tribes to progress into self-serving, independent nations within a larger nation, they will need to find a way to include non-Indians in the political process of the tribal government while still maintaining a distinctive tribal character.”
More news from Michigan State University: http://news.msu.edu/