GEORGIA TECH (US) — When it comes to forming droplets that make up clouds, a little oily organic material doesn’t matter much—good news for reducing the uncertainty of climate model predictions.
Understanding cloud formation is essential for accurate climate modeling, and understanding cloud formation begins with the droplets that make up clouds. Droplets form when water vapor is attracted to particles floating in the atmosphere. These particles include dust, sea salt from the ocean, microorganisms, soot, sulfur—and organic material that can be both viscous and oily.
For years, scientists had believed that particles coated with this organic “goop”—produced by combusted petroleum and biomass—could form droplets more slowly than other particles. That would have had a significant impact on the formation of clouds.
Georgia Tech graduate research assistant Kate Cerully and post-doctoral fellow Katerina Bougiatioti adjust a cloud formation chamber used to measure the rate at which droplets form. (Credit: Gary Meek/Georgia Tech)
But a new study suggests that the long-held belief isn’t true. Based on aerial and ground-based measurements of droplet formation from ten different areas of the northern hemisphere, researchers report that organic coatings on particles don’t seem to significantly affect the rate at which droplets form. The researchers studied a wide range of particles, including organic, hydrocarbon-rich particles from the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
“It turns out that it doesn’t matter how much goop you have—or don’t have—the droplets take the same time to form,” says Athanasios Nenes, a professor in the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences and the School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at at the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech).
“Even in extreme environments like Deepwater Horizon, the rate of droplet formation on particles found over the spill doesn’t differ from that of typical sea salt particles.”
A large question mark
According to the research, published in the early online edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, clouds can hold in heat emitted from the Earth’s surface, contributing to climate warming. But they can also reflect incoming sunlight back to space, producing a climate cooling effect. Predicting how cloud cover will change in the future is therefore essential to good climate modeling.
“The reason we care about droplet formation rates is because the more slowly the droplets form, the more droplets you end up having in clouds,” Nenes says. “This, in turn, affects cloud properties and their climate impacts. For many years, there was the perception that having a lot of oily organic compounds from pollution would make water uptake a lot slower and might make droplets take longer to form. If that were true, it would mean that the impact pollution could have on clouds and climate would be much larger than we thought.”
And that created a large question mark in climate models.
To address that issue, Nenes and his collaborators began a series of studies using a mini-cloud formation chamber small enough to be operated aboard an aircraft.
Cloud in a tube
The chamber consists of a long metal tube that is heated at one end and cooled at the other. The walls of the chamber are kept moist, and air containing particles from outside the aircraft is flowed through. Droplets form on the particles when air in the chamber becomes cool enough that it can no longer retain the moisture. The droplets then exit the chamber where they can be studied.
“With the chamber, we essentially create a cloud in a tube,” Nenes says. “The difference between the cloud in the tube and the cloud outside is that the tube allows us to precisely control the temperature and the amount of water vapor available. We know exactly what is going on with that cloud, and this allows for very accurate measurements of cloud formation.”
Beginning in 2004, Nenes and his graduate students took the chamber along on ten missions operated by NASA, NSF, NOAA and ONR. They flew through the pristine air of the Arctic, smoke from forest fires in Canada, and polluted air masses over the United States. They also sampled polluted air over Mexico City, clean air over the forests of Finland, and dust-laden air over the Mediterranean. Though the particles flowing through the cloud chamber were different each time, the rate at which they formed droplets, the condensation coefficient, remained the same.
“We have literally hundreds of hours of data studying cloud formation from areas all over the globe,” Nenes says. “We didn’t see any changes in the droplet nucleation time scale.”
In future studies, Nenes would like to study particles from other areas of the world, especially Africa and China. He’d also like to see what happens when the temperature of the air flowing through the cloud chamber is cold enough to form ice. There is some evidence that the kinetics of ice formation may be different in particles that are rich in “goop.”
The study of droplet formation provides one small step toward reducing the uncertainty in climate modeling.
“This is good for atmospheric and climate scientists, because some of the uncertainty of droplet formation and aerosol impacts goes away,” Nenes adds. “With careful measurements and global deployment of measuring instruments, you can actually resolve outstanding questions in cloud physics and help simplify the descriptions of clouds in climate models.”
The research was supported by the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Department of Energy, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Office of Naval Research.
Source: Georgia Tech