U. BUFFALO (US) — Following one of Earth’s greatest mass extinctions, a type of tiny marine organism didn’t begin to rapidly develop new physical traits until about 2 million years after its competition became extinct.
The discovery challenges the widely held assumption that a period of explosive evolution quickly follows for survivors of mass extinctions.
In the absence of competition, the common theory goes, surviving species hurry to adapt, evolving new physical attributes to take advantage of newly opened niches in the ecosystem. But that’s not what researchers found in graptoloid populations that survived a mass extinction about 445 million years ago.
“What we found is more consistent with a different theory, which says you might expect an evolutionary lag as the ecosystem reforms itself and new interspecies relationships form,” says Charles E. Mitchell, geology professor at the University at Buffalo who led the research.
The research provides insight on how a new mass extinction, possibly one resulting from man-made problems such as deforestation and climate change, might affect life on Earth today.
“How would it affect today’s plankton? How would it affect groups of organisms in general?” asks lead author David W. Bapst, a PhD candidate at the University of Chicago who studied with Mitchell as an undergraduate. “The general motivation behind this work is understanding how extinction and evolution of form relate to each other, and the fossil record is the only place where we can do these sorts of experiments across long spans of time.”
Graptoloids are an extinct zooplankton that lived in colonies. Because the animals evolved quickly and had a wide geographic range, their fossil record is rich—a trove of information on how species diversify.
For the study, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Bapst, Mitchell, and their colleagues examined two different groups of graptoloids: Neograptines and diplograptines. Each kind lived during the Ordovician mass extinction that began about 445 million years ago, but only neograptines survived.
Before the extinction event, diplograptine species were dominant, outnumbering neograptine species. Diplograptines also varied more in their morphology, building colonies of many different shapes.
With diplograptines gone after the Ordovician mass extinction, neograptines had a chance to recover in an environment free of competitors.
According to the ecological release hypothesis, a popular theory, these circumstances should have led to a burst of adaptive radiation. In other words, without competition, the neograptines should have diversified rapidly, developing new physical traits—new colonial architectures—to take advantage of ecological niches that the diplograptines once filled.
But that’s not what the researchers found.
To test the adaptive radiation idea, they analyzed the colony forms of 183 neograptine and diplograptine species that lived before, during or after the Ordovician mass extinction—a total of 9 million years of graptoloid history.
This wealth of data enabled the team to track graptoloid evolution with more precision than past studies could. What the researchers discovered looked nothing like adaptive radiation.
Not a burst, but a dribble
Almost immediately following the Ordovician mass extinction, new neograptine species proliferated, as expected. But according to the study, these new species displayed only small changes in form or morphology—not the burst of innovation the release hypothesis predicts. In fact, graptoloids had been evolving new physical traits at a more intensive pace prior to the extinction event.
Limited morphological innovation among neograptines continued for approximately 2 million years after the extinction, Bapst says.
The lag supports a model of evolution that argues that interactions between co-evolving species help foster diversification. Because such relationships likely take time to develop in a recovering ecosystem, an evolutionary lag of the kind the graptoloid study detected should occur in the wake of a mass extinction.
Another possible explanation is that newly appeared graptoloid species may have differed in ways outside of physical traits, a phenomenon that biologists refer to as non-adaptive radiations. A third possibility is that graptoloids may have experienced evolutionary lag due to their complex mode of growth.
Besides investigating how neograptines fared after the extinction event, the team also analyzed whether colony form on its own could explain why neograptines survived the mass extinction while diplograptines disappeared. The scientists concluded that this was unlikely, suggesting a role for other factors such as possible differences in the preferred habitat of the two groups.
Researchers from Canisius College in Buffalo and St. Francis Xavier University in Nova Scotia contributed to the study that was supported by the National Science Foundation and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
More news from University at Buffalo: http://www.buffalo.edu/news/