PENN STATE (US) — Putting more money into neighborhood parks could be the answer to healthier, more physically fit residents and a less strained health care system.
Investments in parks and recreational services have a dramatic effect on health and fitness, say Geof Godbey, professor emeritus of leisure studies, and Andrew Mowen, associate professor of recreation and parks management at Penn State University.
“There is a strong relationship between how much money is spent to provide such services and the amount of physical activity that people take part in,” Godbey says. “You get what you pay for.”
Spending an extra $10 per person on park and recreational facilities provides more vigorous exercise for girls and better strength-building for both sexes.
“As the study points out, for just an additional $10, that money provides a significant increase in the amount of exercise you can get,” says Godbey. “What would a health club provide for that same $10?”
The number of parks and playgrounds in a community and their proximity raises the fitness level of residents. For example, one study found that there was an increase of 17 more minutes of physical activity for each park within a half mile of a home.
Access to public parks promotes increased physical activity for nearly all age groups. About 85 percent of middle-aged and older participants surveyed in a five-city study said they visited a local park within the last year. The same survey indicated that 40 percent of those people go to the park more than once a week, a sign that park use is an integral part of their lifestyle.
“Park use becomes more deeply ingrained in users and quickly becomes part of their lives,” says Godbey. “People are being active and having fun for the sake of having fun, not as a health outcome, which, to them, is just an added benefit.”
In correlation, losing access to parks might cause unhealthy behavior.
“The physical benefits of park and recreation access are sort of obvious, but we have to look at the reverse,” Godbey says. “If people aren’t going to parks, what would they be doing with that time? Would they be sitting around at home, drinking a few beers, eating cheese puffs, and watching reruns on television?”
Since government officials often cut park and recreation spending first, evidence presented in the study should be used to educate officials and residents on the relatively inexpensive health benefits parks provide.
“Most people, especially elected officials, consider park and recreational services as an amenity or as discretionary spending,” Mowen says.
“These studies argue that park and recreational facilities are part of the health care system, or should be.”
More news from Penn State: http://live.psu.edu/