Would helmets make girls’ lacrosse more dangerous?

In many girls' lacrosse game situations, given how little other protective equipment female players wear, a hard-sided helmet could easily cause more injuries that it prevents, says Joseph Crisco. "It could actually make the game more aggressive." (Credit: K.M. Klemencic/Flickr)

Should girl lacrosse players be required, like boys, to wear protective headgear? A small study shows that while helmets offer some protection, they don’t prevent concussions and may actually make the game more aggressive.

Lacrosse players swing hard, which is why errant stick blows are the leading cause of concussion in girls’ and women’s lacrosse. Researchers measured how much the worst blows accelerate the head and how different kinds of headgear could reduce those accelerations.

A lacrosse stick striking a crash test dummy head at 1,000 FPS.

Girls’ and women’s lacrosse is a different game from the version played by males. Females wear far less protective equipment than males do, and injuries—especially severe head injuries—are comparatively rare.

“The goal of our study was to answer the question of what types of head accelerations would you see if you were hit in the head with a stick,” says Joseph Crisco, professor of orthopaedic research at Brown University.

For the study, published online in the Journal of Applied Biomechanics, seven female lacrosse players aged 12 to 14 delivered at least 36 whacks each, as hard as they possibly could, to various places on two dummy headforms in the lab.

“The kinds of hits recorded were basically aggressive street fights,” Crisco says. “They were really whacking at it, every shaft was broken by the end of the study, which would never happen in a game. The goal was just to give US Lacrosse and the manufacturers some baseline information on the types of accelerations they could expect to see in a worst-case scenario.”

18 mph lacrosse swings

The girls used six different sticks, each outfitted with motion capture markers. The headforms had embedded accelerometers. In a second set of experiments the headforms donned one of four different kinds of protective headgear.

On average across 508 successful blows in the first experiment, the girls swung their sticks about 18 miles an hour, enough to complete two revolutions in less than a second. A previous study showed, perhaps not surprisingly, that high school and college players swing their sticks even faster.

The peak acceleration the girls delivered to the headforms when they struck them with the shafts of their sticks averaged 60 times the acceleration of Earth’s gravity (60g).

That’s about three times more force than, say, football players with the kind of celebratory head butt that teammates exchange after a big play, Crisco says.

Helmets and concussions

The second set of experiments examined what effect headgear might have on the girls’ harder whacks (those with speeds around 23 miles an hour). Crisco’s team measured the accelerations delivered by 20 whacks from the shaft of each volunteer’s stick on both the back and the side of each headform.


The headforms wore either nothing, a hard-sided men’s lacrosse helmet, a rugby scrum cap, mixed martial arts headgear, or soft headgear designed for girls’ and women’s field hockey and lacrosse.

The average peak accelerations measured on bare headgear were 81.6g for blows to the side and 150.7g for blows to the back. The men’s lacrosse helmet brought the average peak acceleration all the way down to 28.2g on the side and 23.1g on the back. The martial arts and girls lacrosse/field hockey headgear each reduced the accelerations significantly as well, but not nearly as much as the men’s helmet. The rugby cap failed to reduce acceleration for blows to the side but dampened blows to the back a little better than the martial arts or lacrosse/field hockey gear.

Headgear, therefore, significantly reduced head accelerations.

But Crisco cautions against a run on headgear at the sporting goods store based on the study.

Generally research has shown that helmets don’t protect against concussion—only against skull fractures and traumatic brain injury. Very little data connects accelerations to concussion risk, and individual susceptibility varies widely.

Though some research hints at a figure around 100g, only the hard-sided men’s helmet brought accelerations for blows to the back significantly below that figure. And in many game situations, given how little other protective equipment female players wear, a hard-sided helmet could easily cause more injuries that it prevents, Crisco says.

“It could actually make the game more aggressive.”

US Lacrosse and the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment funded the study.

Source: Brown University