DUKE (US)—New evidence gleaned from CT scans of fossils may flip the order in which two kinds of tetrapods, four-limbed animals with backbones, moved from fish to landlubber.
“If there is one take-home message, it is that the evolutionary relationship between these early tetrapods is not well resolved,” says Viviane Callier, a Duke University graduate student and first author of the study.
Both extinct species, known as Ichthyostega and Acanthostega, lived an estimated 360-370 million years ago in what is now Greenland. Acanthostega was thought to have been the most primitive tetrapod, that is, the first vertebrate animal to possess limbs with digits rather than fish fins.
The latest evidence indicates Ichthyostega may have been closer to the first tetrapod. In fact, Acanthostega may have had a terrestrial ancestor and then returned full time to the water, says Callier.
Coauthor Jennifer Clack of the University Museum of Zoology in Cambridge, England—where she supervised Callier’s work for a master’s degree—found the fossils embedded in rocks collected from East Greenland.
Rather than trying to remove them—an action that would have destroyed much of the evidence—the researchers studied the fossils inside the stone with computed tomography (CT) scanning. Callier “reconstructed” the animals using imaging software to analyze the scans, focusing on the shapes of the two species’ upper arm bones, or humeri.
The CT slices revealed that Clack had found the first juvenile forms of Ichthyostega. Previously known fossils of Ichthyostega had come from adults.
Anatomies can morph as animals move towards adulthood, Callier explains. And such shifts can help scientists deduce when in development the animal acquired the terrestrial habit. The fossils suggest that Ichthyostega juveniles were aquatically adapted, and that the terrestrial habit was acquired relatively late in development. The fossils bore evidence that the muscle arrangement in adults was better suited to weight-bearing, terrestrial locomotion than the juvenile morphology. It is possible that Ichthyostega came out of the water only as a fully mature adult.
In contrast, in Acanthostega “there is less change from the juvenile to the adult. Although Acanthostega appears to be aquatically adapted throughout the recorded developmental span, its humerus exhibits subtle traits that make it more similar to the later, fully terrestrial tetrapods,” Callier says.
Because the shapes of its adult limbs seemed the most fin-like, scientists had previously concluded that Acanthostega was “more primitive,” Callier adds. “But now, if we look at the details of the humeri, Ichthyostega’s are actually more similar to earlier fishes.”
Ironically, the shape of Acanthostega’s limbs, in both adult and the newly-discovered juvenile forms, is more “paddle-like” than Ichthyostega’s, Callier says. “They would have been really good swimmers. So, although Acanthostega had limbs with digits, we don’t think it was really terrestrial. We think even the adults were aquatic.”
“If Ichthyostega is actually more primitive than Acanthostega, then maybe animals evolved towards a terrestrial existence a lot earlier than originally believed,” she says. “Maybe Acanthostega was actually derived from a terrestrial ancestor, and then, went back to an aquatic lifestyle.”
Per Ahlberg, a Swedish paleontologist who was previously Clack’s graduate student, also joined Clack in a comparative analysis of other more fish-like species living at about the same time as Ichthyostega and Acanthostega.
Those include Tiktaalik, another animal that has made the news because of scientists’ deductions that it was in transition from water to land.
“It seems like there were different species evolving the same or similar traits independently—evidence of parallel evolution,” Callier says. “The terrestrial environment posed new challenges like feeding and moving on land and breathing air, to which the first tetrapods had to evolve solutions. Sometimes different lineages stumbled upon similar solutions.”
Ahlberg, now professor at the University of Uppsala in Sweden, is corresponding author of the new Science report. The research was funded by the Winston Churchill Foundation and the Swedish Research Council.
Duke University news: www.dukenews.duke.edu