air pollution

Emissions down but still underestimated

U. COLORADO (US)—Chemical pollution hovering over Houston that is produced by manufacturing petroleum products may be getting thinner, but is still significantly underestimated, according to airplane measurements taken as part of a new study.

Inaccuracies in the reporting of emissions pose big challenges for the reduction and regulation of emissions coming from petrochemical plants.

Emissions are important to monitor because some chemicals released from the plants react to form ground-level ozone that can be harmful to human health and agricultural crops.

“Emissions may have decreased some, but there’s still a long way to go,” says study author Joost de Gouw, an atmospheric scientist at the  Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), a joint institute of the University of Colorado at Boulder and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

“And the emission inventories by industry were not any better in 2006 than they were in 2000.”

States that regularly suffer from ozone problems like Texas are required by the federal government to scientifically model what happens during air pollution episodes and develop plans for mitigation. For that to happen effectively, modelers need good inventories.

“Initial inventories are not based on measurements. They’re based on estimates,” says de Gouw. “When you go back to verify those estimates, we find they’re not very accurate.”

To check on those estimates, lead study author Rebecca Washenfelder of NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory and CIRES, along with de Gouw, took to the plumes in an aircraft, the NOAA WP-3D, outfitted with an array of air quality measuring instruments.

The plane flew through emissions over Houston as part of the second Texas Air Quality Study in 2006, sampling air for signs of ingredients of the chemical reaction that makes ozone, including nitrogen oxides and reactive hydrocarbons.

New meaurements were compared with data taken during similar flyovers from the first Texas Air Quality Study in 2000 and another flight in 2002.

They then compared those measurements against emissions inventories for each year. In all cases, the industry-reported inventories—which are supplied to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—didn’t agree with the measured amounts of pollutants.

The conflicting data is likely a problem of estimation and general industry practice, Washenfelder says.

“There are tens of thousands of valves and fittings installed throughout the plants in most cases with an assumed—not measured—leak rate for each.”

But industry is taking steps to lessen ozone-causing emissions, and repairs to petrochemical plants may have contributed to recent emission declines.

Washenfelder and de Gouw say the concentrations of ethene and propene—which both contribute to ozone formation—dropped by 52 percent and 48 percent respectively between 2000 and 2006.

The study should be a wake-up call for emissions monitoring, the researchers say.

“There are a lot of discussions with the petrochemical industry on how to measure these things instead of relying on estimates,” de Gouw says.

“I think the No. 1 issue here is awareness. As soon as industry is aware that there could be emissions problems down the road, they can figure out how to fix them at lower cost.”

The study will be published in the Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres. Funding came from NOAA Air Quality, NOAA Climate Research and Modeling Program, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, and a National Research Council Postdoctoral Fellowship.

More news from University of Colorado: www.colorado.edu/news/

Related Articles