STANFORD (US)—Falling in love can be an earth-shaking moment. That’s especially true for elephants. A Stanford University ecologist has found that when issuing calls, including those of love, elephants produce not only audible sounds but also low-frequency seismic vibrations that can travel for distances up to several kilometers.
Caitlin O’Connell-Rodwell has been studying elephant communication for more than 15 years. During that time she’s puzzled over which seismic sensing system elephants use most often in locating the source of a call. In her most recent field season last summer, she finally got an answer.
In turns out elephants can detect these seismic vibrations in two ways: by bone conduction, in which the vibrations travel from the toe tips into the foot bones, then up the leg and into the middle ear, and by somatosensory reception, involving vibration-sensitive cells in the bottom of the foot that send signals to the brain via nerves.
“They are placing themselves in a way that best suits bone conduction, rather than somatosensory reception,” she explains.
O’Connell-Rodwell, a consulting assistant professor in otolaryngology at Stanford’s School of Medicine, came to her conclusion by conducting a study of how male elephants respond to mating calls from females. She played recorded calls through a speaker coupled with the ground and concealed in a pile of brush near a watering hole in Etosha National Park in Namibia. The speaker emitted both an acoustic and seismic signal.
“The bulls would come in and then we would test them as they headed out of the water hole in different directions. They would always place themselves perpendicular to the direction the sound had traveled,” she says.
That orientation puts each of the elephant’s ears at a different distance from the sound source. It also creates the maximum possible difference in the distance between each of the elephant’s ears and the source. That enhances their ability to distinguish the point of origin. This position was assumed by the elephants whether the signal was only seismic or both acoustic and seismic, suggesting that bone-conducted detection was the preferable method for detecting seismic frequencies. If the elephants preferred somatosensory reception, they would more likely align their front and back feet to create the greatest difference in distance from the source to each pair of feet. But perhaps that’s where the trunk comes in.
Every time the estrus recording was played, the bulls’ behavior was the same, O’Connell-Rodwell says. “They stop, press their trunk on the ground, and position themselves and turn the other way and place their trunk on the ground and do it again,” she explains.
Pressing their trunk against the ground may improve the elephant’s ability to use triangulation to locate a sound source, as using the trunk along with their (front) feet gives them the multiple (three) sensors needed for triangulating, or even front and back which would create a five-sensor array.
O’Connell-Rodwell had observed both male and female listening behavior in previous years but hadn’t focused on the bone-conduction versus somatosensory-reception question. Although she had noticed that both males and females often oriented themselves in a manner that seemed more conducive to employing bone conduction, until this most recent study she hadn’t tested how they responded when the sound effectively came from different locations.
She also noted differences in how bulls and cows behaved when listening.
“The males seem to use their trunk in detecting vibrations much more than females,” she says. “We don’t know why that is yet.”
O’Connell-Rodwell used her observations of female behavior from previous field seasons as a basis for comparison with the males.
In addition, she noticed some behavioral differences in the bulls’ reactions to the estrus calls. The bulls who responded in the characteristic fashion were all either males in musth—a condition in which levels of reproductive hormones skyrocket—or subadult males, as well as juveniles who were too young to go into musth. But adult males who were not in musth showed very little interest in the love calls of the cows and simply walked away from the water hole.
The behavior of the adult males not in musth seemed to confuse any subadult males who were with them, O’Connell-Rodwell notes.
“The subadults would be torn between whether to go toward the estrus call or follow the adult male out,” she adds. “And they would end up following the adult out, but they kept turning back. The adult male wouldn’t pay attention at all.”
O’Connell-Rodwell said more work remains to be done to unravel the social behavior of elephants, but she hopes to have more insights to offer soon.
Stanford University news: http://news.stanford.edu