UC BERKELEY / EMORY (US) — Control over domestic affairs seems to dampen women’s interest in professional power, report researchers.
While household decision-making power was highly valued by both men and women who participated in the study, women reported that running the home made them less likely to pursue promotions and other career advancement steps at the office.
This was not the case for men, whose work goals were unchanged by their domestic role, according to the study.
“It appears that being in charge of household decisions may bring a semblance of power to women’s traditional role, to the point where women may have less desire to push against the obstacles to achieving additional power outside the home,” says co-author Serena Chen, a psychologist at University of California, Berkeley.
Despite the feminist movement and other gender equity efforts, women largely retain authority over child-rearing and household chores and finances, with men deferring to their expertise in these matters, researchers point out. This paradigm has had an impact on women’s career choices, the study implies.
“As a result, women may make decisions such as not going after a high-status promotion at work, or not seeking to work full time, without realizing why,” says Melissa Williams, an assistant professor of business at Emory University and lead author of the study.
She presented the findings on Friday, January 18 at the annual meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology in New Orleans.
In the first experiment, 136 participants ranging in age from 18 to 30 were surveyed on whether being in control of household decisions is desirable and empowering. Both men and women agreed that household control is advantageous.
In another experiment, each of the 166 female participants was asked to imagine two scenarios: That she was married with a child and made most of the household decisions, or that she made most decisions with her husband. The women then rated their life goals in order of importance.
Those who envisioned exercising control over domestic decisions rated the perks of workplace power, such as earning a high salary, lower than participants who imagined sharing household decision-making with their husbands.
In the final experiment, 644 male and female participants were again presented with the scenario of being married with a child and the choice of wielding household power or sharing it with their spouses. But this time, there was another option: The participants had to imagine doing most domestic chores without the distinction of having control of the household.
Again, women who wielded power in the household expressed less interest in workplace power than women who imagined making household decisions equally with their husbands.
Meanwhile, men’s interest in workplace power did not vary across the household power conditions. Thus, the dampening effect of household power on workplace goals is specific to women, researchers say.
Unlike female participants who controlled the household, women presented with the “chores-only” scenario did not show a dampened interest in workplace power compared to those who shared domestic power with their spouse.
“This suggests that it is the power aspect of household control that reduces women’s interest in power outside of the home,” Chen says.
“To realize true gender equality in both the private and public spheres, our results suggest that women may need to at least partially abdicate their role of ultimate household deciders, and men must agree to share such decision-making,” she concludes.
Source: UC Berkeley