PENN STATE (US) — Poultry sold at farmers markets in Pennsylvania tend to have higher levels of bacteria than store-bought birds, researchers say.
Of 100 raw whole chickens purchased from farmers markets throughout Pennsylvania, 90 percent tested positive for Campylobacter and 28 percent harbored Salmonella.
By comparison, during the same period, 20 percent of raw, whole, organic chickens purchased from grocery stores were found to contain Campylobacter bacteria, and 28 percent tested positive for Salmonella. Just 8 percent of raw, whole, nonorganic, conventionally processed chickens from the grocery stores tested positive for Campylobacter and 52 percent of those contained Salmonella.
Overall, the chickens purchased at the farmers markets carried higher bacterial loads than the birds purchased at grocery stores.
[sources]
The research, published online in the Journal of Food Safety, sheds some doubt on the widely held belief that locally bought poultry is safer, according to lead researcher Catherine Cutter, professor and food safety extension specialist in the department of food science at Penn State’s College of Agricultural Sciences.
“Some people believe that local food is safer, but we want to caution that’s not always the case,” she says. Cutter suggests that concerns about antibiotic resistance and animal-welfare issues in large animal-agriculture operations that supply food to supermarket chains may explain why consumers are switching to locally grown and locally processed foods.
“We hope this small study will lead to more extensive research to determine why we are seeing the levels of pathogens in these products and to find ways to mitigate them,” she says.
The significantly higher bacteria levels in chickens sold at farmers markets prompted the researchers to look for a cause.
“In the last decade, farmers markets have become an increasingly important source of food products for millions of Americans,” says Joshua Scheinberg, who conducted the research for his master’s degree in food science.
“As patronage continues to increase at farmers markets and other direct-to-consumer marketing channels, the risks associated with purchasing fresh products directly from the farmer or vendor must be evaluated,” Scheinberg adds. “Potentially hazardous foods, such as milk, cheeses, and raw meat and poultry, also are popular at these venues.”
Safety training
Cutter and Scheinberg speculate that interventions, such as antimicrobial rinses, can lower pathogen levels on poultry carcasses.
“The fact that the chickens from farmers markets had much higher levels of Campylobacter and Salmonella indicated that there’s something else going on,” Cutter says. “So, Josh developed a survey for poultry vendors, with questions focused on processing methods, as well as food safety practices.”
They found that many of the farmers/vendors may not be incorporating antimicrobial interventions during processing. As a result, the researchers now are preparing educational materials and food safety training for farmers and vendors selling poultry products at farmers markets.
Cutter noted that her role as an extension specialist is to develop science-based educational materials for farmers/vendors who sell poultry at markets, explain the applicable local and federal regulations, and emphasize the need for antimicrobial interventions to prevent a higher prevalence of pathogens.
“We are not doing the research to scare consumers or put people out of business; we’re here to improve public health,” she says. “We can train farmers and vendors to produce a safer product that won’t make people sick. This approach also has the potential to help consumers feel more confident about buying their locally grown and processed products.”
Bacteria that cause foodborne illness, such as Campylobacter and Salmonella, are destroyed by proper cooking of poultry products; however, they also can cause cross-contamination if they come in contact with other foods through contaminated cutting boards, sinks, countertops or utensils.
Source: Penn State
