U. WARWICK (UK) — Vaccinating families could protect babies against a common winter virus which can be fatal for infants younger than six months.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) typically leads to mild, cold-like symptoms in adults and older children but can be more serious in babies, possibly leading to bronchiolitis, pneumonia, and even death.
The virus is commonly found all over the world. In the UK, outbreaks generally start in November or December and last four to five months, peaking over the Christmas and New Year period.
In England, 28 per 1,000 hospital admissions in children younger than one year are attributed to RSV each year, according to the Health Protection Agency. Globally, the most recent estimates set the RSV pneumonia burden at 33 million cases and up to 199,000 deaths every year.
It has not previously been clear whether babies younger than six months were more at risk of an RSV infection leading to severe respiratory disease because it was their first infection and they lacked immunity to the virus, or whether it was because of their age.
A new study, published in the American Journal of Epidemiology and based on a cohort of 635 children tracked from birth in Kilifi, Kenya over a period of just under three and a half years, finds that the risk is principally age-related.
This means the physiological changes associated with growing older—such as an increase in size of the small airways of the lungs—are more important in reducing the risk of developing severe respiratory disease than previous exposure.
The finding is significant because it shows that increasing the average age that a child is exposed to RSV infection would lead to fewer cases developing into severe respiratory disease.
Development of a vaccine for the key target age group of newborn babies between 1-3 months of age remains elusive despite 50 years of research. However, several promising candidate vaccines are in the development pipeline that could be given to older children and adults.
In the absence of a vaccine for babies, an alternative would be to immunize parents and older siblings of babies who are up to six months old during the period when the virus is most active.
This type of “cocoon” strategy doesn’t directly inoculate the baby, but instead focuses on people around the infant who are most likely to pass on infection.
Alternatively or in addition, the short term specific immunity that mothers give to their newborn might be extended by vaccination of pregnant women to boost their immunity to RSV, thus increasing the duration of protection in the infant and delaying RSV infection.
“RSV causes more respiratory disease and death in children than any other respiratory virus,” says Graham Medley, professor of life sciences at the University of Warwick. “It is very common world-wide, and people are infected repeatedly through life—if you have a ‘community virus’ in December in the UK, it is probably RSV.
“Children under six months old are at the greatest risk of death from RSV, and this is the first study to clarify why such young children are at risk—is it because they are so young, or is it because infection at this age will be their first infection? The answer is that it is because they are so young.
“This means that if we can protect children until they are older before they become infected, then they will be at a lower risk of dying following infection from RSV.
“The really exciting implication is that we don’t have to vaccinate the baby to protect the baby. Instead we could vaccinate family members to stop them infecting the child—the cocoon strategy. Or we could even consider vaccinating all school-children to try and reduce the amount of virus circulating around the whole community.”
Researchers from the Kenya Medical Research Institute contributed to the study that was funded by the Wellcome Trust.
Source: University of Warwick