More than half of all children in the US either misperceive or reject their parents’ political party affiliations, according to researchers.
“This finding turns the conventional wisdom, as well as years of political socialization research, on its head,” says Christopher Ojeda, a former doctoral student in political science at Penn State and currently a postdoctoral scholar in the Stanford Center for American Democracy at Stanford University.
“As we all know, political discussions can sometimes lead to consensus and they can sometimes lead to conflict.”
“The public, the media, and the academic world have long believed that children learn their political values, such as which party to support or which policy positions to endorse, from their parents. In this view, learning occurs mostly because parents impose their values on their children. This belief depends on the assumption that children know and choose to adopt their parents’ values.”
Mom’s and dad’s politics
The researchers, who report their findings in the American Sociological Review, examined two datasets for the study. In a sample that looked at child-mother relationships, 51.2 percent of children misperceived or rejected their mothers’ political party identification.
In the second dataset, which examined both child-mother and child-father relationships, 53.5 percent of children misperceived or rejected their mothers’ political party affiliation, and 54.2 percent did so for their fathers’ identification.
“Both datasets survey children in adolescence, young adulthood, and adulthood, thereby capturing the full range of the life course,” says Peter K. Hatemi, an associate professor of political science at Penn State who worked with Ojeda.
The researchers also found that more discussion about politics in the home increases the probability that children correctly identify their parents’ party affiliations, but does not increase the likelihood that they will adopt those affiliations.
“We were not surprised by this finding,” Ojeda says. “Parent-child communication is a vehicle for delivering information, but it does not always deliver agreement. As we all know, political discussions can sometimes lead to consensus and they can sometimes lead to conflict.”
On the other hand, the social support children receive from their parents has no effect on whether children know their parents’ party identifications, but it does make it more likely that children will adopt the affiliations they ascribe to their parents.
“Social support does not necessarily lead to more accurate information about someone,” Hatemi says. “But social support does give us a sense of belonging and it leads us to imitate those we are close with. So, we would expect that social support leads children to adopt what they perceive their parents’ party identifications to be.”
Kids aren’t just ‘carbon copies’
Ojeda says the study shows that much of what researchers have interpreted about parent-child similarities when it comes to party identification should be updated.
“Prior to our work, existing research concluded that when parents and children were similar, parents passed on their political values,” he says. “We demonstrate that this view is problematic because it treats children who accurately perceive and adopt their parents’ party affiliations the same as children who misperceive and reject their parents’ party identifications.
“In both cases, the children have the same party affiliation as their parents. However, in order for true transmission to occur, children must actually know their parents’ political values and then choose to adopt them.”
The study highlights the fact that children have a say in determining their own political identities, Hatemi says.
“They are not simply carbon copies of their parents,” he says.
The researchers used data from the Health and Lifestyles Study, a 1988 survey of 8,636 families in the US, and the 2006 and 2008 waves of the National Longitudinal Study of Youth, which focused on 3,356 families. Children in the NLSY data range in age from 18 to 37, and the children in the HLS data range in age from 16 to 82.
Source: Penn State