U. BUFFALO (US)—Although long-term care of sick or disabled loved ones is widely recognized as a threat to the caregiver’s health and quality of life, in some contexts, helping valued loved ones may prove to be mutually beneficial.
Researchers wanted to find out if some aspects of caregiving did not provoke burnout, high stress, and poor health often associated with being a caregiver—and if so, why.
They found that caregivers experience more positive emotions and fewer negatives ones when they engage in active care, like feeding, bathing, and other kinds of physical care.
“Our data don’t tell us exactly what psychological processes are responsible,” says Michael Poulin, assistant professor of psychology at the University at Buffalo.
“But we hypothesize that people may be hardwired so that actively attending to the concrete needs and feelings of others reduces our personal anxiety.”
Details of the study appear in the journal Psychology and Aging.
The study found that passive care, on the other hand, which requires the spouse to simply be nearby in case anything should go wrong, provokes negative emotions in the caretaker, and leads to fewer positive emotions.
The study involved 73 subjects (mean age was 71.5 years, age range was 35-89 years) who were providing full-time home care to an ailing spouse.
Participants carried Palm Pilots that beeped randomly to signal them to report how much time they had spent actively helping and/or being on call since the last beep, the activities they actually engaged in and their emotional state at that moment.
Helping predicted positive and negative effects similarly for adults of all ages. One variable that did affect outcome was the level of perceived interdependence with the spouse experienced by the caregiver—that is, the extent to which caregivers viewed themselves as sharing a mutually beneficial relationship with their spouse.
“For interdependent couples, the positive effects of active care were particularly strong,” Poulin says, adding that this outcome supports the prediction that “individuals should derive the greatest satisfaction out of helping those with whom they perceive a shared physical or emotional fate.”
Poulin says study findings have broad implications for research on caregiving and for research on helping behavior more generally, especially in the aging context.
“Overall,” he says, “we wouldn’t say that caring for an ailing loved one is going to be good for you or healthy for you, but certain activities may be beneficial, especially in high-quality relationships.”
Researchers and social scientists want government or other agencies to provide respite for caregivers, which would be a good thing, Poulin says.
“But as this study demonstrates, it is extremely important that caretakers receive the right kind of relief at the right time—perhaps less time off from active care duties, and more time off from the onerous task of passively monitoring an ailing loved one.”
More news from University at Buffalo: http://www.buffalo.edu/news/