Wildlife to U.S.: Don’t fence me in

U. TEXAS-AUSTIN/ YALE (US) — Animals living along the U.S.-Mexican border are at increased risk due to fences than run for miles, blocking as much as 75 percent of some species’ ranges.

“Our study is the first comprehensive analysis of threats to species across the entire U.S.-Mexico border,” says Jesse Lasky, a graduate student working with Tim Keitt, associate professor of integrative biology at the University of Texas-Austin.

“The scale at which these fences stretch across the landscape is large, so it’s important for us to also have a large-scale view of their effects across the continent.”

The Arroyo toad, which is federally endangered, and the Colorado Desert fringe-toed lizard, which is a fderal species of concern, are two of the many threatened species in the California border region. (Credit: U. Texas-Austin)


The study is published online in the journal Diversity and Distributions.

Among the species at risk include four species listed as threatened globally by both the U.S. and Mexico, and another 23 with small range sizes, including the Arroyo toad, the California red-legged frog, and the jaguarundi.

“We were able to identify a list of animal species that are most at risk and should be prioritized and monitored for change,” Lasky says. “We’re hoping this helps point decision-makers towards the animals to look at first when making priorities for conservation.”

Most at risk of extinction are smaller populations of wildlife that occur in more specialized habitats. Even animals that appear to have large ranges may live in isolated habitats within those ranges that can be heavily disturbed by border fences.

Human population growth along the border also poses threats to the wildlife.

When the ranges of these animals are separated by barriers like border fences and roads, the animals’ ability to move is limited. The isolated populations are then more vulnerable to unforeseen disturbances, such as a hurricane or fire, which can wipe out an entire population.

Isolation also increases inbreeding depression, which means the animals have limited opportunities to mix their genes with others and accumulate harmful mutations.

The study analyzed the ranges of 313 non-flying mammals, reptiles, and amphibians and identified three major regions where wildlife is most vulnerable: the high human population areas of coastal California and coastal Texas and the unique “sky island” Madrean archipelago habitat in southeastern Arizona.

These regions have high numbers of vulnerable species. Some species in California have barriers that block as much as 75 percent of their ranges.

“The U.S.-Mexico border spans regions of extraordinary biological diversity as well as intense human impacts,” says Keitt. “Loss of biological diversity can have negative impacts on the ecosystem services that are the basis of our life-support system.”

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is waived from environmental regulations when building security infrastructure. There are about 750 miles of border fences and human migration barriers along the border.

Walter Jetz, associate professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at Yale University is a co-author of the study.

More news from University of Texas at Austin: www.utexas.edu/news/