Is ‘beach nourishment’ worth the cost?

"Everyone knows that when you nourish a beach, it doesn't last forever. It gets washed away," says Greg Kiker. (Credit: David Lebech/Flickr)

A new computer model may help coastal managers better understand the long-term effects of major storms, sea-level rise, and beach restoration activities.

Using erosion data following tropical storms and hurricanes that hit Santa Rosa Island, off Florida’s Panhandle, and sea-level rise projections, researchers at the University of Florida were able to predict beach habitat changes over the next 90 years.

But they say their model can be used to inform restoration decisions at any beach.


Since the first project of its kind in the US at Coney Island, NY, in 1922, coastal managers have used beach nourishment—essentially importing sand to replace sediment lost through storms or erosion—to restore damaged beaches, but it is laborious and expensive. Adding to coastal managers’ headaches, the offshore sand used for such ventures is running short.

Florida has allotted $37 million in state money for beach nourishment projects this fiscal year, which ends June 30, and has appropriated almost $105 million over the past five years, according to the state Department of Environmental Protection.

“Moving large amounts of sand onto the beach is costly,” says Rafael Muñoz-Carpena, professor of agricultural and biological engineering and co-author of the study that is published in the journal Environmental Modelling and Software.

“Certainly preserving the beach has important benefits for humans and ecology, but as with any management decision, benefits need to be balanced by cost, especially when sooner or later the beach might be lost to sea-level rise or a major storm. How much is it worth for society to keep the beach longer in a given spot?”

Will benefits wash away?

Decision-makers need to answer those questions, and the answers won’t be cheap, Muñoz-Carpena says.

Researchers used the model to find out how long a beach will last under varying conditions, says co-author Greg Kiker, associate professor in agricultural and biological engineering.

“Everyone knows that when you nourish a beach, it doesn’t last forever. It gets washed away,” Kiker says. With mean sea level rising, a storm that may not have done as much damage 20 to 40 years ago can do more damage today. “As engineers, we said, ‘Okay, what can we do about it?'”

By using the model, coastal managers can assess tradeoffs─spending vs. benefits─of beach nourishment that will provide the most benefit for vulnerable species, adjacent residential areas, and military installations, Muñoz-Carpena says.

The study asked for research to assess the future vulnerability of endangered and protected shorebirds on Panhandle military installations to rising sea levels and major storm surges.

100 percent beach reduction

Researchers used erosion data and post-storm nourishment strategies after hurricanes Ivan and Dennis and Tropical Storm Katrina struck the island, which is part of Eglin Air Force Base in Fort Walton Beach. The beach suffered severe erosion after each storm.

They also used National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration data from 69 major storms over the past 154 years, within about 65 miles of Santa Rosa Island, to construct storm-striking scenarios.

Computer simulations of 4,000 storms suggested that without nourishment, a tropical storm or hurricane and sea level rise would reduce Santa Rosa Island’s beach by 97 percent to 100 percent by the year 2100.

But that loss could be cut to 60 percent with a 3-foot beach and to 34 percent with 5 feet of sand nourishment.

The researchers say they’re not urging coastal managers to pump sand, which generally comes from offshore, onto beaches at any particular frequency and warn that the data may be limited by the uncertainty of future tropical storms and sea level projections.

Source: University of Florida