PENN STATE (US) / UCL (UK) — Children exposed to community violence still exhibit a physical stress response up to a year later, suggesting such exposure may have long-term negative health consequences.
“We know that exposure to violence is linked with aggression, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and academic and cognitive difficulties in the short term, but little is known about the long-term effects of such exposure,” says Elizabeth Susman, professor of biobehavioral health at Penn State.
“Our data show that the stress reaction to violence exposure is not just immediate. There’s an effect that endures.”
The scientists recruited 124 adolescents, ranging in age from 8 to 13 and living in small city and rural communities, to participate in the study.
“Most studies of the effects of exposure to violence look at children who live in inner cities and urban communities,” says Melissa Peckins, biobehavioral health graduate student.
“Our study is unique because we focused on children who live in small towns, so they are not children you would normally expect to be exposed to a lot of violence. Also, these were healthy children without a history of reported maltreatment.”
The researchers gave each of the adolescents a questionnaire, which identified their lifetime exposure to violence and exposure within the past 12 months. They then gave the adolescents the beginning of a story and asked them to complete it in front of two mock judges, whom they were told were evaluating their responses and performances for later comparison to those of other children the same age. Following the story-completion task, adolescents were also given a serial subtraction task.
“The story completion task and mental arithmetic task are commonly used to elicit a stress response in laboratory settings,” Peckins says. “Our hypothesis was that children who have been exposed to more violent events in the past year will have an attenuated response to the laboratory stressor—even 12 months after the incidence—compared with children who experienced fewer violent events.”
The team measured the children’s stress responses by comparing the cortisol levels present in samples of their saliva collected before and after the stress test was administered.
“In males, we found that as exposure to violence increased, cortisol reactivity decreased, so cortisol reactivity was attenuated; it was a habituation effect,” Peckins says.
The finding was not present in females. The results were published online in a recent issue of the Journal of Adolescent Health.
“In enduring stressful conditions, we may have adapted evolutionarily to suppress our cortisol levels because higher and more prolonged levels of cortisol in the bloodstream can lead to negative health consequences, such as autoimmune disorders, lowered immunity, arthritis and atypical depression. This may explain why cortisol reactivity was lower for males,” Susman says.
“However, there is a theory that females may react to stressful situations by talking about it, which may be their way of reducing the negative effects of cortisol in the bloodstream. If parents and other adults are available to discuss episodes of violence with children, it might help the children, especially females, to reduce their cortisol levels.”
In the future, the team hopes to examine the role of duration of exposure to violence and time elapsed after exposure to violence on cortisol reactivity.
Samantha Dockray, research fellow at University College London , was a co-author on the study.
The National Institute of Mental Health, the General Clinical Research Center of the National Institutes of Health, and Penn State supported this work.
More news from Penn State: http://live.psu.edu/