Get the ocean’s ‘fingerprint’ in a water sample
Environmental policy have to respond to fluctuating conditions on the ground and in the water, but doing so requires a constant flow of information about the living world.
Scientists say environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling techniques could make assessing the biodiversity of marine ecosystems—from single-cell critters to great white sharks—as easy as taking a water sample.
Controlling invasive species and saving endangered ones are among the many applications of the new set of monitoring tools that use DNA recovered from the environment.
Although traditional sampling methods—including dive surveys and deploying sampling gear in the water—have been widely used in environmental monitoring, they are expensive, invasive, and often focus only on a single species. Because animals shed eDNA into the environment, the method could overcome some of these issues.
eDNA is like a fingerprint left at a crime scene. The material may come from metabolic waste, damaged tissue, or sloughed off skin cells. Scientists can collect and then sequence the DNA to create a fast, high-resolution, non-invasive survey of whole biological communities.
“The eDNA work is potentially a game-changer for environmental monitoring,” says Larry Crowder, professor of biology at Stanford University and coauthor of a new study published in Science. “A number of laws require monitoring, but actually keeping tabs on large, mobile, cryptic animals is challenging and expensive.”
Science of genomics
The cost of DNA sequencing is decreasing rapidly, a trend that has fueled eDNA studies in recent years.
“We wanted to know how to put these amazing new genetic tools to use,” says lead author Ryan Kelly, assistant professor at University of Washington and a visiting fellow at the Center for Ocean Solutions. “Harnessing eDNA is a perfect example of how cutting-edge science can plug into many of the environmental laws we have on the books.”
Nearly every environmental law imposes environmental monitoring obligations on government or the private sector, says Meg Caldwell, a senior lecturer at the Stanford Woods Institute and Stanford Law School, and a contributing author of the study. “Pushing the science of genomics to help society perform monitoring more cheaply and effectively is one of our core goals.”
The authors provide several examples of scientific-legal interactions, among them the use of eDNA to inform the enforcement of laws such as the Endangered Species Act and Clean Water Act with detailed, low-cost data.
Where did it come from?
So far, eDNA has been used to determine the presence or absence of certain target species. This technique is useful for detecting invasive species or changes in the distribution of endangered species. However, scientists are still evaluating how eDNA concentrations relate to specific numbers of organisms in the wild.
A challenging aspect of the approach is determining exactly where the eDNA was generated, especially in dynamic marine systems. eDNA is thought to persist in water for only a few days.
With these limitations, eDNA alone is not yet enough for policy applications, but it is already being used to supplement existing monitoring. This combination approach has recently been used in California to detect human- and animal-based pathogens in waters off state beaches.
“There is much work left to do to develop and validate this approach, but the potential is amazing,” Crowder says.
The David and Lucile Packard Foundation provided initial funding for the original concept of the eDNA tool as part of its core support to the Center for Ocean Solutions, as well as additional funding to begin testing the tool in the field. A recent Environmental Venture Project grant from the Stanford Woods Institute will help researchers refine it.
Source: Stanford University