“Federal efforts and research dollars tend to focus on reading, math and science, while writing is often left out in the cold,” says Gary Troia. (Credit: G.L. Kohuth/Michigan State)

US school kids get ‘abysmal’ writing training

With only a quarter of US students scoring “proficient” in writing, the new Common Core standards don’t go far enough to address glaring gaps for students and teachers, an education expert argues.

Gary Troia, an associate professor in Michigan State University’s College of Education, calls for a fresh approach to professional development for teachers who must help students meet the new writing standards.

“We need to re-orient the way we think about teacher professional development,” says Troia, whose research appears in the journal School Psychology Review. “We need to be smarter about professional development and make sure it’s comprehensive, sustained, and focused on the needs in the classroom.”

The Common Core standards aim to improve US student performance in mathematics and English language arts, which include writing. The standards have been adopted by 45 states and are in various phases of being rolled out for implementation.

While the standards are strong in some areas of writing instruction, they are weak in many others, Troia says. For example, spelling and handwriting are not addressed comprehensively in early grades. Keyboarding is a focus only in grades 3 through 6, even though computers have become increasingly important throughout school and new assessments aligned with the Common Core will use computers. And the standards don’t reinforce teaching of some writing genres useful in civic life and personal growth.

The stakes are high, Troia says, as only about a quarter of US students are performing at a proficient level in writing.

“Federal efforts and research dollars tend to focus on reading, math, and science, while writing is often left out in the cold,” Troia says. “We’re trying to point out that writing is really important and that we should focus more on writing so it’s no longer the neglected ‘R’.”

Troia was referring to a groundbreaking 2003 report by the National Commission on Writing which argues that writing instruction has been shortchanged in K-12 schools, and colleges and universities. Not much has changed since that report was released a decade ago, he says.

“When you look at writing instruction in the K-12 classroom, it’s still pretty abysmal,” he says. “Teachers are generally not adapting instruction for struggling writers and most students struggle with writing if you look at national test scores.”

The Common Core was not designed to tell teachers how to help students meet its writing standards, Troia notes. Still, because many of the writing standards are new for most states—or uncovered in current professional development—classroom teachers will need to consult other educators and resources to acquire the needed knowledge, he says.

Troia recommends classroom teachers get help from school personnel who are familiar with research and research-based writing instruction and assessment practices such as special educators, school psychologists, and speech-language pathologists.

“School psychologists and others can function as a valuable resource for teachers and schools in their efforts to deploy evidence-based practices, especially for students who struggle with writing,” Troia says.

The US Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences funded the study.

Source: Michigan State University

chat1 Comment

You are free to share this article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license.

  1. Bruce William Smith

    The school psychologists are to be called upon as the experts in helping teachers to improve student writing? What about English department chairs, or academic deans? Perhaps Professor Troia is only thinking of primary school personnel; but if so, this could have been written more clearly by specifying such. In any event, the Common Core State Standards are unlikely to be satisfactory in preparing our students for success in selective universities, and other newly available data are suggesting that any other universities will very likely not be worth the investment that American universities are calling for.

We respect your privacy.