Uncanny replicas faze monkeys, too
PRINCETON (US)—Researchers have come up with a new twist on the mysterious visual phenomenon experienced by humans known as the “uncanny valley.” Monkeys also sense it.
The uncanny valley hypothesis was introduced by the Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. The “valley” refers to a dip in a graph that charts a human’s positive reaction in response to an image on one axis and a robot’s human-likeness on another.
People like to study other human faces, and they also can enjoy scrutinizing countenances that clearly are not human, such as a doll’s or a cartoon figure’s. But when an image falls in between—close to human but clearly not—it causes a feeling of revulsion.
Movie-goers may not be familiar with the term, but they understand that it is far easier to love the out-of-proportion cartoon figures in the The Incredibles, for example, than it is to embrace the more realistic-looking characters in The Polar Express. Viewers, to many a Hollywood director’s consternation, are emotionally unsettled by images of artificial humans that look both realistic and unrealistic at the same time.
In an attempt to add to the emerging scientific literature on the subject and answer deeper questions about the evolutionary basis of communication, Princeton University researchers have found that macaque monkeys also fall into the uncanny valley, exhibiting this reaction when looking at computer-generated images of monkeys that are close but less than perfect representations.
“Increased realism does not necessarily lead to increased acceptance,” says Asif Ghazanfar, an assistant professor of psychology and the Princeton Neuroscience Institute, who led the research. It is the first such finding in any animal other than human. The paper appears in the October Oct. 12 edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The work, according to its authors, is significant because it indicates that there is a biological basis for the uncanny valley and supports theories that propose that the brain mechanisms underlying the uncanny valley are evolutionary adaptations. “These data demonstrate that the uncanny valley effect is not unique to humans and that evolutionary hypotheses regarding its origins are tenable,” says Ghazanfar.
Karl MacDorman, an associate professor in the School of Informatics at Indiana University, who has led experiments in the fields of android science and computational neuroscience, says the results will be of broad interest to scientists and non-scientists, including “ethologists, animal behaviorists, cognitive psychologists of human perception, evolutionary psychologists, primate social cognitive neuroscientists, humanoid roboticists, and human character animators.”
In the experiments, the monkeys, which normally coo and smack their lips to engage each other, quickly avert their glances and are frightened when confronted by the close-to-real images. When asked to peer at the less close-to-real faces and real faces, however, they viewed them more often and for longer periods.
Despite the widespread acknowledgement of the uncanny valley as a valid phenomenon, there are no clear explanations for it, Ghazanfar says. One theory suggests that it is the outcome of a “disgust response” mechanism that allows humans to avoid disease. Another idea holds that the phenomenon is an indicator of humanity’s highly evolved face processing abilities. Some have suggested the corpse-like appearance of some images elicits an innate fear of death. Still others have posited that the response illustrates what is perceived as a threat to human identity.
Ghazanfar says the research, which was funded by the National Science Foundation, is likely to point him in useful directions to further explore these theories.
Princeton University news: www.princeton.edu/main/news/