ecoli_1

Tune E. coli to churn out biodiesel

STANFORD (US) — E. coli bacteria have what it takes to produce high volumes of biofuel cheaply and efficiently. All that’s needed, scientists say, is a tweak to kick E. coli into high gear.

Biodiesel can be made from plant oil or animal fat. Used cooking oil from restaurants is common, but for biodiesel to contribute significantly to reducing fossil fuel use, there needs to be a way to mass produce it from plant-derived raw materials. The problem is that synthesizing biodiesel is complicated. That’s where E. coli comes in.

The bacteria, often discussed in terms of the human digestive tract, also act as a catalyst in generating biodiesel by converting inexpensive sugars into fatty acid derivatives that are chemically similar to gasoline.

But E. coli’s natural conversion capability is not up to snuff, commercially speaking, and researchers tinkering with its internal machinery have yet to boost its capability enough to cross the commercial threshold.

So Chaitan Khosla, a professor of chemistry and of chemical engineering at Stanford University, decided to investigate whether there might be a natural limit that holds back E. coli’s conversion capabilities. In other words, does the basic catalytic engine in E. coli have enough horsepower to do the job at the needed scale?

A powerful engine

“The good news is that the engine that makes fatty acids in E. coli is incredibly powerful,” Khosla says. “It is inherently capable of converting sugar into fuel-like substances at an extraordinary rate. The bad news is this engine is subject to some very tight controls by the cell.”

It turns out that like any high performance engine, the catalytic process in E. coli can only attain peak efficiency when all the controls are tuned just right.

Scientists don’t yet understand how all the cellular controls operate. It will require a deeper understanding of the biochemistry of E. coli than they have now to figure that out, Khosla says.

But his research team is making progress homing in on the most promising part of the conversion process, thanks in part to a new approach they employed in their analysis, reported online in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Researchers managed to isolate all the enzymes and other molecular participants involved in the process that produces fatty acids in E. coli and assemble them in a test tube for study.

“We wanted to understand what limits the ability of E. coli to process sugar into oil. The question we were asking is analogous to asking what limits the speed of my Honda to 150 miles an hour and no faster?” Khosla says. “The most direct and powerful way to figure it out is to pull the biosynthetic engine out of the cell and put it through its paces in a test tube.”

By doing so, the team was able to study how the enzymes involved in fatty acid biosynthesis performed when they were free from other cellular influences. That was critical to their analysis, because the products in question, fatty acids, are essentially soap, Khosla says, and too much of them would hurt the bacteria. That is why E. coli has developed some very elaborate and effective ways to contain the amount of fatty acid biosynthesis inside the cell.

Precursor to biodiesel

The fatty acids can’t be pumped directly into your gas tank—cars and trucks won’t run on soap, after all—but they are an excellent precursor to biodiesel.

Biodiesel has so far lagged behind ethanol as a means of cutting fossil fuel use in vehicles because ethanol is easier and cheaper to make. But biodiesel has a higher energy density and lower water solubility than ethanol, which offer significant advantages.

“It is closer in chemical properties to a barrel of oil from Saudi Arabia than any other biologically derived fuel,” Khosla says. Thus it could easily be blended into diesel and gasoline, or used alone as a bona fide transportation fuel.

If researchers can figure out how to manipulate the cellular means of production in E. coli, biodiesel could be made cheaply enough that the little engine of E. coli could end up powering a lot of larger engines at far less cost to the environment than with fossil fuels.

Xingye Yu, graduate student in chemical engineering, and Tiangang Liu, postdoctoral scholar in chemistry, are coauthors of the paper. The research was funded by a grant from LS9, a biofuels company.

More news from Stanford University: http://news.stanford.edu/

chat5 Comments

You are free to share this article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license.

5 Comments

  1. Chris Carter

    This is all very well, but has anyone thought of what might happen if (when) the engineered E.Coli break loose and fill up rivers and seas , spewing diesel into the environment ?

  2. Ru1138

    @Chris Carter

    There are ways to prevent that from happening. Maybe the E Coli could be made so that it only produces fuel when given a feedstock that doesn’t occur in nature.

  3. Chris Carter

    Mother nature is millions of years old and has devised many ways to circumvent our best intentions. Genes that we put in will mutate, bacteria divide at a phenomenal rate, and gene exchange between bacterial species (horizontal gene transfer) is common (via nanotubes) http://www.cell.com/abstract/S0092-8674%2811%2900016-X. Bacteria are infected by bacteriophages and gene transfer up and down the animal kingdom is now a recognised reality.. None of this is can be controlled.

  4. Jason Major

    If we are going to worry about GM bacteria escaping should we then scrap drug making by this method? ie about 20-25% of our drugs are made by bacteria genetically modified to churn out loads of the drug (eg insulin and one of the clotting factors to treat haemophilia), or industrial compound. If they escape into the wild, assuming they can even survive, they too could pass on their genes and disrupt ecosystems. This form of drug manufacturing has been happening for decades. These risks are manageable, but whether they can be managed in an acceptable way is subjective. Jason, TechNyou, University of Melbourne.

  5. Jedh Timkang

    I would like to ask if there is a follow-up discovery on this. thanks.

We respect your privacy.