Top Stories - Posted by Ken McGuffin-Toronto on Monday, September 3, 2012 6:18 - 3 Comments    
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 3.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Thinking ‘time is money’ can spoil time off

Thinking about time in terms of money "changes the way you actually experience time," says Sanford DeVoe, a researcher at the University of Toronto. (Credit: iStockphoto)

U. TORONTO (CAN) — Do you pass the time—or spend it? The difference may affect how happy you are during leisure time, research shows.


People who put a price on their time are more likely to feel impatient when they’re not using it to earn money. And that hurts their ability to derive happiness during leisure activities.

Treating time as money can actually undermine your well-being,” says Sanford DeVoe, one of two researchers at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management who carried out the study, which is scheduled for publication in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

DeVoe and PhD student Julian House based their conclusions on three experiments. In each, a sub-group of participants was primed, through survey questions, to think about their time in terms of money.

This group subsequently showed greater impatience and lower satisfaction during leisure activities introduced during the experiments.

However, those put into the sub-group reported more enjoyment and less impatience when they were paid during one of those activities, which was listening to music.

The experiments’ results demonstrate that thinking about time in terms of money “changes the way you actually experience time,” says DeVoe. “Two people may experience the same thing, over the same amount of time, yet react to it very differently.”

With growth over the last several decades in jobs paid by the hour, it’s important for people to be “mindful” of the impact this can have on their leisure enjoyment, he says, and allow themselves “to really smell the roses.”

More news from the University of Toronto: http://news.utoronto.ca/

Please wait

3 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

robin murphy
Feb 21, 2012 16:32

I do not agree with the article, I’m sorry.

redcrucible2
Feb 24, 2012 13:46

I’ll return to my favorite game red crucible

cindy
Sep 3, 2012 13:44

Am thinking that the study group and subgroups that they selected were not large enough or random enough….I have “great impatience and low satisfaction” for these studies……………seems the harder the work, the sweeter the rewards.

Leave a Comment

Comment

Research news from leading universities

Daily E-News


Follow Futurity

RSS feedsFacebookTwitter

Week's Most Discussed

  • Loading...

Media Partners

Alltop logo EarthSky logo Pulse logo Flipboard logo The Conversation logo

Browse By School