Top Stories - Posted by William Harms-Chicago on Monday, July 2, 2012 10:28 - 13 Comments    
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

For US youth, political action is online

"Anyone who cares about democracy needs to pay attention to this important dimension of politics for young people—participatory politics spread information, mobilize individuals to act, and provide many ways for youth to voice their perspectives," says Joseph Kahne. (Credit: iStockphoto)

U. CHICAGO (US) — A new survey of US youth offers the most complete picture to date of how young people are using new media  to participate in politics. 


The findings provide relevant insights on both the long-term political picture in America and the upcoming 2012 election.

The MacArthur Research Network on Youth and Participatory Politics (YPP), under the direction of co-principal investigators University of Chicago political scientist Cathy Cohen, and Joseph Kahne, professor of education at Mills College, has unveiled the findings of the largest nationally representative study to date of new media and politics among young people.

Straight from the Source

Read the original study

The national survey questioned 3,000 young people ages 15-25 on how they use the Internet, social media, and engage in politics. Unlike any prior study on the topic, the YPP survey included large numbers of black, Latino, and Asian American respondents, allowing for unique statistical comparisons across race.

The study report, Participatory Politics: New Media and Youth Political Action shows that contrary to the traditional notion of a technological digital divide, substantial numbers of young people across racial and ethnic groups are engaging in “participatory politics”—acts such as starting a political group online, circulating a blog about a political issue, or forwarding political videos to friends.

Like traditional political acts, these address issues of public concern. The difference is that participatory acts are interactive, peer-based, and do not defer to elites or formal institutions. They are also tied to digital or new media platforms that facilitate and amplify young people’s actions.

“As the 2012 election approaches, it is important to realize how young people, especially youth of color, are using new media to amplify their voices in the political realm,” says Cohen.

“Not only did we find that large numbers of youth take part in participatory politics, but, defying conventional expectations, black and Asian-American youth are the most avid users of new media for friendship and interest-driven activities. Moreover, black youth participate in online forms of participatory politics at rates equal to or slightly higher than white, Latino and Asian-American youth.”

“Anyone who cares about democracy needs to pay attention to this important dimension of politics for young people—participatory politics spread information, mobilize individuals to act, and provide many ways for youth to voice their perspectives,” says Kahne.

“But there are challenges. These politics also spread misinformation, and they may promote voice more than influence. When we asked young people if they thought they and their friends would benefit from learning more about how to tell if online information was trustworthy, 84 percent said, ’Yes!’ In massive numbers, youth are saying they need help with digital media literacy.”

The YPP national survey and analysis of the data was supported by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, whose $100-million digital media and learning initiative aims to determine how digital media are changing the way young people learn, play, socialize, and participate in civic life.

Kahne and Cohen led a team of three researchers: Benjamin Bowyer and Ellen Middaugh at Mills College and Jon Rogowski at the University of Chicago. The study has an overall margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points.

Key findings:

Large proportions of young people across racial and ethnic groups have access to the Internet and use online social media regularly to stay connected to their family and friends and pursue interests and hobbies.

  • A majority or near-majority of white (51 percent), black (57 percent), Latino (49 percent), and Asian American (52 percent) youth report sending messages, sharing status updates and links, or chatting online daily.

Participatory politics are an important dimension of politics:

  • 41 percent of young people engaged in at least one act of participatory politics during the prior 12 months, while 44 percent participated in other acts of politics.
  • Specifically, 43 percent of white, 41 percent of black, 38 percent of Latino, and 36 percent of Asian-American youth participated in at least one act of participatory politics during the prior 12 months.

Participatory politics are an addition to an individual’s engagement rather than an alternative to other political activities:

  • US citizens who were 18 or older and who engaged in at least one act of participatory politics were twice as likely to report voting in the November 2010 elections as those who did not engage in participatory politics.
  • A large proportion—37 percent of all young people—engages in both participatory and institutional politics.
  • Among young people who engage in participatory politics, 90 percent of them either vote or engage in other forms of politics.

Participatory politics are equitably distributed across different racial and ethnic groups:

  • Contrary to the notion of a technological digital divide, the YPP study finds that overwhelmingly, white (96 percent), black (94 percent), Latino (96 percent) and Asian American (98 percent) youth report having access to a computer that connects to the Internet.
  • The difference in voting in 2008 between the group with the highest rate of turnout according to the US Census Bureau—black youth (52 percent)—and the group with the lowest rate of turnout—Latino youth (27 percent)—is 25 percentage points.
  • In contrast, the difference between the group with the highest rate of engaging in at least one act of participatory politics—whites (43 percent)—and the groups with the lowest rate of engaging in at least one act of participatory politics—Asian Americans (36 percent)—is only 7 percentage points.
  • Taking into account participatory politics, institutional politics, and voting, black youth are the most likely to have participated in at least one form of these activities.
  • Engagement is highest among black youth, with only 25 percent reporting no engagement in any form of political behavior, compared with 33 percent of whites, 40 percent of Asian Americans, and 43 percent of Latinos.

Credibility check

Youth now consume news through participatory channels. 45 percent of youth reported getting news at least once a week from family and friends via Twitter or Facebook feeds. This rivals the 49 percent who reported getting news at least once in the past week from newspapers or magazines. Youth believe they would benefit from learning how to judge the credibility of what they find online.

Survey respondents were asked, “Do you think people like you and your friends would benefit from learning more about how to tell if news and information you find online is trustworthy?”—84 percent said, “Yes.”

“While we can probably assume that youth will learn to use their cell phones without formal instruction,” Kahne says, “they may well benefit from supports and programs in both school and out-of-school settings that strengthen their ability and desire to produce media that is informed, persuasive, and distributed effectively.”

“A key question that emerges from these findings is: ‘Are we prepared to provide the resources, supports, and media literacy training necessary for youth of color to transfer their digital social capital into influence in the political realm?’,” asks Cohen. “Participatory politics offers a political realm where voices of young people are at the center and driving the agenda. Are we prepared to embrace their innovation, support their engagement, and give them greater control, voice, and potentially influence over the issues that matter most in their lives?”

Methodology

On behalf of Mills College, Knowledge Networks (KN) conducted the YPP survey through online and telephone modes from February 9, 2011 to July 14, 2011. Both modes were administered in English- and Spanish-language versions. The median online respondent completed the survey in 35 minutes, and the median telephone interview lasted 44 minutes.

The target population for the survey comprised young people between the ages of 15 and 25, who were residents of the United States and from four ethnic/racial groups: non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, non-Hispanic Asians, and Hispanics (of any race). In order to be able to make meaningful comparisons across racial and ethnic groups, the study also included oversamples of African Americans, Asian Americans, and Hispanics.

More news from the University of Chicago: http://news.uchicago.edu/

Please wait

13 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

r.
Jul 2, 2012 10:55

this is to my mind a solid piece of research – sounds like a good model for possible long-term enfranchisement in a territory defined by network reach rather than geography.

BILL GATES
Jul 2, 2012 15:38

political science: PHD in politics. The Homeless could told them this. Walking down street or sitting in a Coffee-House. One can tell Now people are using lots of computers/mobile phones.

POLITICS IS NOT A SCIENCE.

POLITICS IS FREE FREE FREE ON INTERNET/WEB.

Compared the Real-Sciences in the Experimental sciences. Experiments just cannot lie. Nature cannot lie.

Witness the Two Space Shuttle Accidents. One US Space Shuttle going up and the 2nd one coming down.

You just cannot fake the experimental sciences.

The social sciences is FAKE sciences. HOAX-sciences.

INTERNET WILL EXPOSED THESE DEGREES AND JOBS AS FAKE DEGREES. FAKE JOBS….

FIDEL CASTRO
Jul 2, 2012 18:29

WHY JOBS ARE GOING TO INDIA/CHINA…

You got to be kidding.

You need to spend $100,000 to go to Univesity of Chicago to learn 18-years are using their Cell Phones/Ipad/Iphone to text about politics.

I can see this All for FREE FREE FREE at McDonald/Burger-King/Walmart

SOCIAL SCIENCES IS CRAP Sciences.

Social Sciences is for the 18-years who cannot pass Algebra.

All Social Sciences is FREE FREE FREE ON INTERENT/WEB

kimbee
Jul 3, 2012 4:18

FIDEL GATES/BILL CASTRO – I think you’ve missed the point of scientific research… Yes it may well be obvious to any monkey that people use their devices often. But ‘obvious’ and ‘evidence from experimental data’ are by no means the same thing. Think about it for a minute, if you can.

MAO ZEDONG
Jul 4, 2012 3:35

1. human society is NOT a science Never haven been and never will.. HOAX SCIENCES. HOAX DEGREES. FAKE DEGREES.

USA cannot count how many people live in USA. Just count one nose one person..

social sciences is Wanna-Be Science.

HOAX ON THE KNOW-NOTHING 18-22 YEAR PAYING $200,000 FOR THE MOST EXPENSIVE PIECE OF PAPER ON EARTH..

ALL books on sciences scieces is Free Free Free at public libary. on CNN/PBS/GOOGLE/INTERNET.

social sciences/humanities will be exposed as HOAX HOAX HOAX AF UFO’S , BIG FOOT, LOCH NESS MONSTER , ELVIS ALIVE WORKING AT BURGER-KING….

SOCIAL SCIENCES HOAX IS LIKE THE ELVIS GOT A PHD IN QUANTUM MECHANICS HOAX

HOAX

HOAX

HOAX ON THE 18-YEAR BEER-DRINKING FRATERNITY CROWD

kimbee
Jul 4, 2012 4:24

1. Nobody said that human society was a science. Studying it can be a science, if experimental techniques are used and conclusions are drawn from evidence.

Your conclusions, however, seem to involve typing ‘HOAX’ a lot. A hoax is like a trick, you fool someone into believing that something is true. Social Sciences are not a hoax, nobody is asked to study them and all who do are asked to question what they are taught – because that is what you do in science.

I’m not an expert in social science, but I studied science up to post-grad so I know a bit about how to raise an argument. If you could provide any evidence to back up your opinions, I’d be interested to hear it.

Just a few corrections for you:

The US has a census every 10 years, this is the most accurate way for any government to count the population.

To study up to degree level, independently, you would struggle to get the material required to complete even just the first year of study from free sources. When you go to university you get an ‘Athens’ account, this is paid for by the university and allows you access to any academic journal online (and more).

Humanities includes history and geography, granted much of history is based on assumptions and biased accounts but geography? You think geography is a hoax?

BILL GATES
Dec 18, 2012 1:40

consider this: tenure -track academics. free money in college for teaching..

1. politics… any Homeless can be politics professor.

2. humanities. any one -eye homeless man can teach any class on humanities.. a bottle of Jack Daniels and you can be a poet/writer tomorrow.

3. creative writing/arts/humanities/social sciences/liberal arts:

All teaches can be hired from the HOMELESS CENTER….

ANY HOMELESS MAN CAN TEACH THE SOCIAL SCIENCE/HUMANITIES. DEGREE.

4. In fact, internet/web/google will make all liberal arts/humanities academics Homeless..

HOAX DEGREES. FAKE JOBS FOR FAKE PEOPLE IN A FAKE WORLD.

HOAX FOR $200,000 US Dollars.

r.
Dec 18, 2012 2:50

bill, why don’t you try saving your uneducated glib WHITE SUPREMACY for other people on the internet fishing around for excuses to be bigots without a CLUE about how things in the lives of others function?

and no, you aren’t going to make us Homeless, you nasty Bigot. now go gossip about that since you seem to KNOW EVERYTHING U KNOW-IT-ALL

kimbee
Dec 18, 2012 5:28

r. – he thinks geography is a hoax and that anyone could teach to degree level without an education or training. It’s really not worth the effort.

BILL GATES
Dec 18, 2012 17:14

internet/google finest universities on earht. Harvard /Yale /stanford/ univ of california/univ of chicago.

look at what $200,000 will buy a degree in.

Not to mention All free at public library..

1. politics

2. english.. I can speak english..

3. art history.

4. social (hoax ) science.

5. creative writing..

6. writing with a six-pack of budweiser.

7. religion studies. folks $1 dollar bible at $1 store.

8. business. yes. i read 50-books on business. that makes a have a fortune 500 company…

yes. reading a book is like having a real business.

9. womyn studies. yes. study the WOMYN

10. area studies.

11. international studies

12. ABC studies

13. XYZ. studies…

YES. WE CAN ALL AGREE HOMELESS CAN TEACH/GET A MA/PHD IN THESE DEGREES.

YES…. all humanities academics will be at the Homeless shelter in the days of Internet/Web/Google Age.

kimbee
Dec 19, 2012 4:23

2. english.. I can speak english..

Clearly not very well…

Isaac Newton
Feb 1, 2013 20:31

it used to be one can buy a Degree from the back of a Matchbox or buy a degree from in the mail.

Now, we can buy a degree from then internet.u
1. american studies. yes, I study USA.

2. cultural studies. yes, I study culture..

3. philosophy: I think at starbucks

4. Art: yes I throw painat at a canvas.

5. social sciences. yes. people, all 7-billion is a scinece..

6. international studies. yes. watching CNN is a great degree….

World now has 3- billion people on internet..

World will see these degrees are NOT different than the ones I can buy from a Matchbox,, 7-eleven or Online on Internet for $9.99.

DyebyWresee
May 14, 2013 4:52

[url=http://truecialishere.com/#tzowj]cheap cialis[/url] – order cialis , http://truecialishere.com/#pxpjl cialis 20 mg

Leave a Comment

Comment

Research news from leading universities

Daily E-News


Follow Futurity

RSS feedsFacebookTwitter

Week's Most Discussed

  • Loading...

Media Partners

Alltop logo EarthSky logo Pulse logo Flipboard logo The Conversation logo

Browse By School