<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Darts raise doubts about who was first to America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futurity.org/top-stories/darts-raise-doubts-about-who-was-first-to-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futurity.org/top-stories/darts-raise-doubts-about-who-was-first-to-america/</link>
	<description>Research news from leading universities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:07:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/top-stories/darts-raise-doubts-about-who-was-first-to-america/comment-page-1/#comment-66792</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 00:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurity.org/?p=72092#comment-66792</guid>
		<description>There was also a spear-head discovered that was made from mastodon bone (found ironically lodged in mastadon bone) that was C14 dated to pre-Clovis times. There is more and more evidence that Native Americans were in the Americas a lot longer than the prevailing theories. Time for the Clovis-first model to be put to rest.

mikekrohide: No not necessarily. It would only point to two migrationary groups if the tool traditions were brought to the Americas from outside, rather than being developed on American soil after migration happened. Separate groups would work out different ways of making tools on their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was also a spear-head discovered that was made from mastodon bone (found ironically lodged in mastadon bone) that was C14 dated to pre-Clovis times. There is more and more evidence that Native Americans were in the Americas a lot longer than the prevailing theories. Time for the Clovis-first model to be put to rest.</p>
<p>mikekrohide: No not necessarily. It would only point to two migrationary groups if the tool traditions were brought to the Americas from outside, rather than being developed on American soil after migration happened. Separate groups would work out different ways of making tools on their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikekrohde</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/top-stories/darts-raise-doubts-about-who-was-first-to-america/comment-page-1/#comment-66592</link>
		<dc:creator>mikekrohde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurity.org/?p=72092#comment-66592</guid>
		<description>does this mean there are two distinct groups settling north america, and that they came from different places?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does this mean there are two distinct groups settling north america, and that they came from different places?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
