This quick visual test predicts IQ

U. ROCHESTER (US) — A brief test of a person’s ability to filter out visual movement—in this case, black and white bars moving across a screen—can predict IQ.

The test is the first purely sensory assessment to be strongly correlated with IQ and may provide a non-verbal and culturally unbiased tool for scientists seeking to understand neural processes associated with general intelligence.


“Because intelligence is such a broad construct, you can’t really track it back to one part of the brain,” says Duje Tadin, a senior author on the study and an assistant professor of brain and cognitive sciences at the University of Rochester. “But since this task is so simple and so closely linked to IQ, it may give us clues about what makes a brain more efficient, and, consequently, more intelligent.”

Watch the bars move

In the study, individuals watched brief video clips of black and white bars moving across a computer screen. Their sole task was to identify which direction the bars drifted: to the right or to the left.

The bars were presented in three sizes, with the smallest version restricted to the central circle where human motion perception is known to be optimal, an area roughly the width of the thumb when the hand is extended. Participants also took a standardized intelligence test.

As expected, people with higher IQ scores were faster at catching the movement of the bars when observing the smallest image. The results support prior research showing that individuals with higher IQs make simple perceptual judgments swifter and have faster reflexes.

“Being ‘quick witted’ and ‘quick on the draw’ generally go hand in hand,” says Michael Melnick, a doctoral candidate in brain and cognitive sciences at the University of Rochester.

‘Much, much worse’

But the tables turned when presented with the larger images. The higher a person’s IQ, the slower they were at detecting movement.

“From previous research, we expected that all participants would be worse at detecting the movement of large images, but high IQ individuals were much, much worse,” says Melnick.

That counter-intuitive inability to perceive large moving images is a perceptual marker for the brain’s ability to suppress background motion, the authors explain. In most scenarios, background movement is less important than small moving objects in the foreground.

Think about driving in a car, walking down a hall, or even just moving your eyes across the room. The background is constantly in motion.

Just a fluke?

The key discovery in this study is how closely this natural filtering ability is linked to IQ. The first experiment found a 64 percent correlation between motion suppression and IQ scores, a much stronger relationship than other sensory measures to date.

For example, research on the relationship between intelligence and color discrimination, sensitivity to pitch, and reaction times have found only a 20 to 40 percent correlation.

“In our first experiment, the effect for motion was so strong,” recalls Tadin, “that I really thought this was a fluke.”

So the group tried to disprove the findings from the initial 12-participant study conducted while Tadin was at Vanderbilt University working with co-author Sohee Park, a professor of psychology. They reran the experiment at the University of Rochester on a new cohort of 53 subjects, administering the full IQ test instead of an abbreviated version and the results were even stronger; correlation rose to 71 percent. The authors also tested for other possible explanations for their findings.

For example, did the surprising link to IQ simply reflect a person’s willful decision to focus on small moving images? To rule out the effect of attention, the second round of experiments randomly ordered the different image sizes and tested other types of large images that have been shown not to elicit suppression.

High IQ individuals continued to be quicker on all tasks, except the ones that isolated motion suppression. The authors concluded that high IQ is associated with automatic filtering of background motion.

“We know from prior research which parts of the brain are involved in visual suppression of background motion. This new link to intelligence provides a good target for looking at what is different about the neural processing, what’s different about the neurochemistry, what’s different about the neurotransmitters of people with different IQs,” says Tadin.

Cultural bias

The relationship between IQ and motion suppression points to the fundamental cognitive processes that underlie intelligence, the authors write. The brain is bombarded by an overwhelming amount of sensory information, and its efficiency is built not only on how quickly our neural networks process these signals, but also on how good they are at suppressing less meaningful information.

“Rapid processing is of little utility unless it is restricted to the most relevant information,” the authors conclude.

The researchers point out that this vision test could remove some of the limitations associated with standard IQ tests, which have been criticized for cultural bias.

“Because the test is simple and non-verbal, it will also help researchers better understand neural processing in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities,” says co-author Loisa Bennetto, an associate professor of psychology.

The National Institutes of Health supported the study, which was published in the journal Current Biology.

Source: University of Rochester

chat12 Comments

You are free to share this article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license.


  1. steve j

    I’m pretty sure I did well with both small and large images. Does this mean I’m both smart and dumb?

  2. LB

    Could their findings be confounded by a cohort who plays video games?

  3. Grammy

    Were the subjects all in one age range? All college students?

  4. J

    Awesome! I am High IQ! :)

  5. Adam

    Sadly @J I think probably not otherwise you would have a said “have a” rather than “am”!

  6. AT

    @Adam, your culture bias is showing.

  7. CLF

    And how did they determine who had a high or low IQ to base the results of the test? A flawed IQ exam. Brilliant.

    Here, let my high IQ wipe this memory from my brain forever. Next!

  8. Ryan

    Sadly Adam, you may want to brush up on current English. Yours has become rusty.

  9. James Acton

    Wow… lot’s of whoosh here regarding J’s comment! Not sure what that’s saying ;]

  10. museum of television and radio california

    Before you buy a television extended warranty, make sure
    that you go through the warranty documentation in detail.
    TV has greatly evolved from being the ‘idiot-box’ from the one which
    not only delivers drama and soap operas but also is the best device
    which provides the news and information from
    all over the world and keeps us up-to-date with the current reality.
    There is a saying in business that goes like this:
    “You don’t make money by working hard, you make money by getting other people to work hard for you.

  11. Adam

    I think there are people out there with processing disorders, executive and sensory, who this doesn’t apply to, i.e., those on the autism spectrum, those with ADHD, and those with low latent inhibition, who will probably be inconsistent on the high iq end of their respective spectrums. Also, there are people who may process the smaller images who have average intelligence, i.e., those with over focused ADHD, HFA or perhaps OCD.

    While the ability to drown out the forest for the trees is something a person with Aspergers is great at, like me, they may see the trees piece mentally, which I do. The result is a slow, not a fast, processing speed. Although on this task I need fewer than 5 frames to see the smaller lines’ movement, I am not ‘quick-minded’. I do have a high iq, but it isn’t a quick iq. It takes me longer to connect the dots, despite being quicker at spotting them.

    So, I think there should be a cross sectional study, as to correlations in people who process information differently, and that this is mostly inconclusive.

  12. how to unlock iphone 5s

    The point is that one is paying more monthly to pay off their smart phone.
    You might be wondering why the thousands of apps available in the official Apple store wouldn’t be enough for an i – Phone user.
    Furthermore it is also an financial issue for apple to keep
    the traffic to app store for applications purchasing.

We respect your privacy.