<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Futurity.org &#187; seismology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futurity.org/tag/seismology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futurity.org</link>
	<description>Research news from leading universities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:03:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>Can computers predict the next tsunami?</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/can-computers-predict-the-next-tsunami/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/can-computers-predict-the-next-tsunami/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Stober-Stanford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth & Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmospheric sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsunamis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurity.org/?p=45225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.futurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/fault_news_1.jpg"></p><p class="first"><strong>STANFORD (US) —</strong> Scientists have developed computational models of the earthquake and resulting tsunami that devastated Japan in 2010 in order to predict disasters of the same scale.<span id="more-45225"></span></p><p>When the magnitude 9.0 earthquake struck off the coast of Japan in March, it triggered a tsunami that killed more than 20,000 people and destroyed entire cities. It was the largest earthquake ever recorded in Japan, and the scale of the disaster stunned even geophysicists who specialize in earthquake science.</p><p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/can-computers-predict-the-next-tsunami/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Earthquakes: Mega-heat, miniscule space</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/earthquakes-mega-heat-miniscule-space/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/earthquakes-mega-heat-miniscule-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Lewis-Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth & Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brown University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast slip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fault lines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash heating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurity.org/?p=41932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.futurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Flashheating2_1.jpg"></p><p class="first"><strong>BROWN U. (US) —</strong> In an earthquake, rock surfaces sliding past each other create intense stress and heat—but only in super-small places where the surfaces actually touch.<span id="more-41932"></span></p><p>This intense heating can occur even while the temperature of the rest of the fault remains largely unaffected, a phenomenon called flash heating.</p><p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/earthquakes-mega-heat-miniscule-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New view of California&#8217;s tectonic plates</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/new-view-of-californias-tectonic-plates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/new-view-of-californias-tectonic-plates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Lewis-Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth & Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brown University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geological sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plate tectonics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurity.org/?p=41554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.futurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Rift1.jpg"></p><p class="first"><strong>BROWN (US) —</strong> The highest resolution picture ever obtained of southern California&#8217;s lithosphere shows its thickness differs markedly, offering new insight into how rifting shaped the area&#8217;s terrain.<span id="more-41554"></span></p><p>Rifting is one of the fundamental geological forces shaping the planet, but because it involves areas deep below the Earth’s surface, scientists have been unable to understand fully how it occurs. What is known is that with rifting, the center of the action lies in the lithosphere, which makes up the tectonic plates—including the crust and part of the upper mantle.</p><p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/new-view-of-californias-tectonic-plates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teams compete to forecast quakes</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/science-technology/teams-compete-to-forecast-quakes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futurity.org/science-technology/teams-compete-to-forecast-quakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 14:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Fell-UC Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of California at Davis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurity.org/?p=41236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.futurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/seismograph_UCDavis_1.jpg"></p><p class="first"><strong>UC DAVIS (US) —</strong> The best earthquake forecasts are about 10 times more accurate than a random prediction, according to new research.<span id="more-41236"></span></p><p>For the study published in the <em><a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/108/40/16533.abstract?sid=93e34a1f-c1dd-4e20-8844-72b85420c70c" target="_blank">Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, </a></em>researchers from the <a href="http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=10025" target="_blank">University of California, Davis</a> compared seven different earthquake forecasts (including their own) that were submitted to a competition organized by the Southern California Earthquake Center.</p><p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futurity.org/science-technology/teams-compete-to-forecast-quakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Be warned: Seismologists on trial in Italy</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/science-technology/be-warned-seismologists-on-trial-in-italy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futurity.org/science-technology/be-warned-seismologists-on-trial-in-italy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 18:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Louis Bergeron-Stanford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford University]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurity.org/?p=41083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.futurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/beroza_news_1.jpg"></p><p class="first"><strong>STANFORD (US) — </strong>The manslaughter trial of six Italian seismologists highlights the need for scientists to put more effort into explaining their work to the public, says geophysicist <a href="http://pangea.stanford.edu/departments/geophysics/people/type/gregory-beroza">Greg Beroza</a>.<span id="more-41083"></span></p><p>He calls for seismologists to issue &#8220;earthquake forecasts&#8221; on an ongoing basis to help the public understand changes in the likelihood of a major earthquake occurring in a given region.</p><p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futurity.org/science-technology/be-warned-seismologists-on-trial-in-italy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Japan&#8217;s tsunami picked up by radar</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/japans-tsunami-picked-up-by-radar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/japans-tsunami-picked-up-by-radar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Fell-UC Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth & Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continental shelf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceanography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsunamis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of California at Davis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurity.org/?p=39012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.futurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/radar-and-tsunami_1.jpg"></p><p class="first"><strong>UC DAVIS (US) —</strong> The tsunami that devastated Japan on March 11 was the first to be observed by high-frequency radar, raising the possibility of new early warning systems.<span id="more-39012"></span></p><p>&#8220;It could be really useful in areas such as southeast Asia where there are huge areas of shallow continental shelf,&#8221; reports John Largier, an oceanographer at the <a href="http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=9976" target="_blank">University of California, Davis</a> and author of a new paper published in the journal <em><a href="http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/3/8/1663/" target="_blank">Remote Sensing.</a></em></p><p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/japans-tsunami-picked-up-by-radar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexico quake’s path veered from norm</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/mexico-quake%e2%80%99s-path-veered-from-norm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/mexico-quake%e2%80%99s-path-veered-from-norm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Williams-Hedges-Caltech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth & Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Institute of Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plate tectonics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurity.org/?p=38232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.futurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Baja_quake_1.jpg"></p><p class="first"><strong>CALTECH (US) —</strong> The El Mayor-Cucapah earthquake that struck Baja California in April 2010 took a divergent route, causing a fault line that remained straight on the surface but was warped and complicated at depth.<span id="more-38232"></span></p><p>In a typical earthquake, the line of intersection between the area where the fault slips and the ground is more complicated at the surface than it is below. Transform plate boundary structures—where two plates slide past one another—tend to be vertically oriented, which allows for lateral side-by-side shear fault motion.</p><p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/mexico-quake%e2%80%99s-path-veered-from-norm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Japan earthquake rocked soil stability</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/japan-earthquake-rocked-soil-stability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/japan-earthquake-rocked-soil-stability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Toon-Georgia Tech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth & Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmospheric sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Institute of Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurity.org/?p=37144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.futurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/earthquake-1.jpg"></p><p class="first"><strong>GEORGIA TECH (US) —</strong> Japan&#8217;s March 11 magnitude 9.0 earthquake weakened the subsurface rock and soil by as much as 70 percent, according to a new study.<span id="more-37144"></span></p><p>Understanding how subsurface materials respond could be vital information for engineers and architects designing future buildings that are able to withstand the level of acceleration measured in the Japan quake.</p><p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/japan-earthquake-rocked-soil-stability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stiff sediment caused killer tsunami</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/stiff-sediment-caused-killer-tsunami/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/stiff-sediment-caused-killer-tsunami/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Green-U. Texas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth & Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsunamis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Southampton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Texas at Austin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurity.org/?p=35566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.futurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/tsunamiship_1.jpg"></p><p class="first"><strong>U. TEXAS-AUSTIN (US)/U. SOUTHAMPTON (UK) —</strong> A thick plateau of hard, compacted sediment was a major factor in the 2004 undersea earthquake off the coast of Sumatra that spawned the deadliest tsunami in recorded history.<span id="more-35566"></span></p><p>Once the fault snapped, the rupture was able to spread up from tens of kilometers below the seafloor to just a few kilometers below the seafloor, much farther than weak sediments would have permitted—allowing it to move a greater column of seawater above it, unleashing much larger tsunami waves.</p><p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futurity.org/earth-environment/stiff-sediment-caused-killer-tsunami/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tokyo faces risk of massive aftershock</title>
		<link>http://www.futurity.org/top-stories/tokyo-faces-risk-of-massive-aftershock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futurity.org/top-stories/tokyo-faces-risk-of-massive-aftershock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Fell-UC Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of California at Davis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurity.org/?p=30536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.futurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/aftershock_video.jpg"></p><p class="first"><strong>UC DAVIS (US) — </strong>Computer models suggest Tokyo may be at serious risk from a massive aftershock and associated tsunami, according to seismologist John Rundle.<span id="more-30536"></span></p><p>The March 11 magnitude 9.0 temblor near Sendai, Japan, has been followed by hundreds of powerful aftershocks that have migrated southwards, notes Rundle, who is professor of geology and physics at the <a href="http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=9810" target="_blank">University of California, Davis</a>.</p><p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futurity.org/top-stories/tokyo-faces-risk-of-massive-aftershock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

